Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Enterprise 05-21-03 (Season Finale)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mark" data-source="post: 900580" data-attributes="member: 5"><p>OK. Now that I've played my usual part of rebuffing the detractors... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> ...time to throw a few bones to the critics. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You address three of the four problems I did have with the show. </p><p></p><p>I am on board with the "why didn't water flow into the swath?" complaint. It looks more devastated to have a gaping stretch but I see no way they could have avoided the water flowing in to fill the gap.</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure how the Klingons managed to scan that Enterprise was leaving dock, been close enough to do so, and not been detected by another Starfleet vessel or satelite in our solar system. I'll have to look for an explanation during the rerun.</p><p></p><p>I'm also curious why they didn't give us at least a taste of the "General and the Marines" but I understand the potential problem with casting not having been done yet. Still, they could have made mention of them or new quarters being added, or something.</p><p></p><p>The third problem I have is with "Quantum Dating" and I have no idea why someone else hasn't jumped all over this yet. If something exists, no matter in what timeline, it must have been around for a period of time and I would think that it's elements would show to have been converted/transformed/mutated/refined or whatever "a certain amount of time ago" no matter at what point they would have been scanned. To whit, if a device is manufactured 432 years before, but is brought forth in time 400 years, would it not scan as being manufactured 32 years before? If something is manufactured 432 in the future, sits on a shelf for thirty-two days, is brought back in time 432 years, and sits in a hanger for two months wouldn't it scan as being manufactured three months ago?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mark, post: 900580, member: 5"] OK. Now that I've played my usual part of rebuffing the detractors... :p ...time to throw a few bones to the critics. ;) You address three of the four problems I did have with the show. I am on board with the "why didn't water flow into the swath?" complaint. It looks more devastated to have a gaping stretch but I see no way they could have avoided the water flowing in to fill the gap. I'm not sure how the Klingons managed to scan that Enterprise was leaving dock, been close enough to do so, and not been detected by another Starfleet vessel or satelite in our solar system. I'll have to look for an explanation during the rerun. I'm also curious why they didn't give us at least a taste of the "General and the Marines" but I understand the potential problem with casting not having been done yet. Still, they could have made mention of them or new quarters being added, or something. The third problem I have is with "Quantum Dating" and I have no idea why someone else hasn't jumped all over this yet. If something exists, no matter in what timeline, it must have been around for a period of time and I would think that it's elements would show to have been converted/transformed/mutated/refined or whatever "a certain amount of time ago" no matter at what point they would have been scanned. To whit, if a device is manufactured 432 years before, but is brought forth in time 400 years, would it not scan as being manufactured 32 years before? If something is manufactured 432 in the future, sits on a shelf for thirty-two days, is brought back in time 432 years, and sits in a hanger for two months wouldn't it scan as being manufactured three months ago? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Enterprise 05-21-03 (Season Finale)
Top