Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Enterprise: weekly discussion [prob spoilers too]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ashtal" data-source="post: 14662" data-attributes="member: 3"><p><strong>Hrmmmm...</strong></p><p></p><p>I am very torn about this ep (and I only saw the second half).</p><p></p><p>I liked the character development and I loved the doctor but I can't get around the choices and decisions made.</p><p></p><p>They've played god on regular occasions, when it suits them. The Prime Directive generally gets thrown around when they want to make a social comment in the context of the story.</p><p></p><p>To me, the bottom line here was that Enterprise denied humanitarian aid to people who desparately needed it. Yes, they were given a stop-gap measure, but their reasoning was faulty. By that rational, every people who can contribute humanitarian aid *shouldn't* because it becomes playing god. What about the humanitarian aid given to other cultures in our own world? Just because they are human doesn't count - these aliens are sentient beings. Human's also make an effort to interfere, both positively and negatively, in the evolution of non-sentient species with regularity. (Not that I am saying humanity can do whatever the hell it wants and destroy whole species - no, they must be careful and minimize their impact when they can.) </p><p></p><p>And there was no guarantee that the intelligent species of the planet would remain dominent forevermore. The secondary species may have evolved and surpassed the first, either demanding peace or through violence.</p><p></p><p>The way they talk about evolution is that there is an overwhelming 'plan' in place, stretching from the beginnings to their endings, as if directed by fate. And that's not the case. Evolution is about events that happen - and stuff happens 'cause it happens, not because of some preordained plan. For example, let's say the subservant species ends up dying due to plague, but the intelligent species still ends up dying out. Both cultures are lost. Any number of things "might" happen. If we're going to play the what if game...what about the lives and culture that will be lost if these people AREN'T helped? Who knows what great discovery they may make in the future that can help others?</p><p></p><p>Giving them warp drives? No. Weapons, aiding in a war, no...but this is humanitarian aid! Aleviate suffering where you can, without strings attached (like pushing your faith or putting conditions on it), if the people ask for it. I love the show, but I don't like how Star Trek, in many of it's incarnations, apply the Prime Directive only when it suits them for story episodes. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Ashtal</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ashtal, post: 14662, member: 3"] [b]Hrmmmm...[/b] I am very torn about this ep (and I only saw the second half). I liked the character development and I loved the doctor but I can't get around the choices and decisions made. They've played god on regular occasions, when it suits them. The Prime Directive generally gets thrown around when they want to make a social comment in the context of the story. To me, the bottom line here was that Enterprise denied humanitarian aid to people who desparately needed it. Yes, they were given a stop-gap measure, but their reasoning was faulty. By that rational, every people who can contribute humanitarian aid *shouldn't* because it becomes playing god. What about the humanitarian aid given to other cultures in our own world? Just because they are human doesn't count - these aliens are sentient beings. Human's also make an effort to interfere, both positively and negatively, in the evolution of non-sentient species with regularity. (Not that I am saying humanity can do whatever the hell it wants and destroy whole species - no, they must be careful and minimize their impact when they can.) And there was no guarantee that the intelligent species of the planet would remain dominent forevermore. The secondary species may have evolved and surpassed the first, either demanding peace or through violence. The way they talk about evolution is that there is an overwhelming 'plan' in place, stretching from the beginnings to their endings, as if directed by fate. And that's not the case. Evolution is about events that happen - and stuff happens 'cause it happens, not because of some preordained plan. For example, let's say the subservant species ends up dying due to plague, but the intelligent species still ends up dying out. Both cultures are lost. Any number of things "might" happen. If we're going to play the what if game...what about the lives and culture that will be lost if these people AREN'T helped? Who knows what great discovery they may make in the future that can help others? Giving them warp drives? No. Weapons, aiding in a war, no...but this is humanitarian aid! Aleviate suffering where you can, without strings attached (like pushing your faith or putting conditions on it), if the people ask for it. I love the show, but I don't like how Star Trek, in many of it's incarnations, apply the Prime Directive only when it suits them for story episodes. Ashtal [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Enterprise: weekly discussion [prob spoilers too]
Top