Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
ENWorld Edition Bias
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shadeydm" data-source="post: 4616416" data-attributes="member: 44243"><p>To me there is a strong pro 4E bias on the site and has been for some time now. This is most clearly reflected in how the boards are moderated.</p><p>Someone who does not like some aspect of 4E and posts this opinion in a pro 4E thread is banned from the thread but the thread continues. While someone who is pro 4E can thread crap in a discussion about a shortcoming of 4E and the thread gets locked instead, a win-win for the pro 4E crowd.</p><p>Similarly someone who is pro 4E makes personal attacks against someone who is critical of 4E and they simply get a reprimand. Meanwhile when someone who is foolish enough to do the same to the pro 4E crowd, they not only get a thread ban or site ban but the offensive post actually gets deleted.</p><p>Even now there is lengthy thread which basically says that if you don’t switch to 4E then the problem is with you not with 4E somehow I can’t imagine the reverse sticking around long.</p><p>Point in case not that long ago there was a lengthy thread discussing the flaws of 3E this thread grew long and stayed civil yet at the same time several threads were started to try and have a similarly calm discussion about 4E’s flaws and those were consistently thread crapped by the pro 4E crowd and locked down by the mods. If this isn’t bias then I don’t know what is.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shadeydm, post: 4616416, member: 44243"] To me there is a strong pro 4E bias on the site and has been for some time now. This is most clearly reflected in how the boards are moderated. Someone who does not like some aspect of 4E and posts this opinion in a pro 4E thread is banned from the thread but the thread continues. While someone who is pro 4E can thread crap in a discussion about a shortcoming of 4E and the thread gets locked instead, a win-win for the pro 4E crowd. Similarly someone who is pro 4E makes personal attacks against someone who is critical of 4E and they simply get a reprimand. Meanwhile when someone who is foolish enough to do the same to the pro 4E crowd, they not only get a thread ban or site ban but the offensive post actually gets deleted. Even now there is lengthy thread which basically says that if you don’t switch to 4E then the problem is with you not with 4E somehow I can’t imagine the reverse sticking around long. Point in case not that long ago there was a lengthy thread discussing the flaws of 3E this thread grew long and stayed civil yet at the same time several threads were started to try and have a similarly calm discussion about 4E’s flaws and those were consistently thread crapped by the pro 4E crowd and locked down by the mods. If this isn’t bias then I don’t know what is. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
ENWorld Edition Bias
Top