Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
ENWorld Fantasy Basketball 2005-06 (Sign up now!)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Sigil" data-source="post: 2590535" data-attributes="member: 2013"><p>As to trades, IIRC, there were a grand total of three trades last season. Two were swaps of 9th or 10th men for other 9th or 10th men, and the one "blockbuster" was something like Andre Miller plus Chris Mihm for Paul Pierce and an even scrubbier Center than Mihm (maybe Zaza Pachulia? Can't recall who, even though I was in on the trade).</p><p></p><p>As to the two center position thing... I just fired my way through the top 120 players (on the assumption that 10 "playing slots" per team times 12 teams means that on average, 120 players will get a lot of minutes) as listed by Yahoo's O-Rank, and found that there are 23 of those players eligible at Center... which just happens to be one shy of two per team. When you consider that rookies Bogut, Diogu, and Frye (of the top-10 picks, who probably will get playing time) are also eligible at Center, that works out to a little more than two center-eligible players per team. And I don't think there are only "5 good centers" - by my count, there were 9 center-eligible players in the top 42 as ranked by Yahoo... compare to 18 forward-eligible players and 23 guard-eligible players (note this doesn't sum to 42 as some players are eligible at multiple positions), and consider that there are, statistically, twice as many guards and forwards on the floor as there are centers, and this doesn't look particularly lopsided.</p><p></p><p>Besides, I think it's nice to make teams stretch a little bit... if there are so few teams that everyone has star players at every position, there's no need for trades. If everyone is stretched a position or two thin, it forces you to make decisions about where you are going to have your holes. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>--The Sigil</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Sigil, post: 2590535, member: 2013"] As to trades, IIRC, there were a grand total of three trades last season. Two were swaps of 9th or 10th men for other 9th or 10th men, and the one "blockbuster" was something like Andre Miller plus Chris Mihm for Paul Pierce and an even scrubbier Center than Mihm (maybe Zaza Pachulia? Can't recall who, even though I was in on the trade). As to the two center position thing... I just fired my way through the top 120 players (on the assumption that 10 "playing slots" per team times 12 teams means that on average, 120 players will get a lot of minutes) as listed by Yahoo's O-Rank, and found that there are 23 of those players eligible at Center... which just happens to be one shy of two per team. When you consider that rookies Bogut, Diogu, and Frye (of the top-10 picks, who probably will get playing time) are also eligible at Center, that works out to a little more than two center-eligible players per team. And I don't think there are only "5 good centers" - by my count, there were 9 center-eligible players in the top 42 as ranked by Yahoo... compare to 18 forward-eligible players and 23 guard-eligible players (note this doesn't sum to 42 as some players are eligible at multiple positions), and consider that there are, statistically, twice as many guards and forwards on the floor as there are centers, and this doesn't look particularly lopsided. Besides, I think it's nice to make teams stretch a little bit... if there are so few teams that everyone has star players at every position, there's no need for trades. If everyone is stretched a position or two thin, it forces you to make decisions about where you are going to have your holes. ;) --The Sigil [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
ENWorld Fantasy Basketball 2005-06 (Sign up now!)
Top