Sciurus Rex
First Post
I can't find the original thread in which the moderators were outlining some of the minor changes we can expect later this year with the release of ENWorld version 3.5, so I apologize for possibly repeating old material.
Is it true that we'll no longer be allowed to discuss "broken" ranger rules? I, for one, would applaud such a change, and I don't know why the original ENWorld engineers didn't include that policy in the first version of this message board.
I also like the (hinted at) addition of "Hivemind" and "Pantheon" prestige classes for certain users, and Piratecat's idea for developing other sublevel prestige groups within this community. (Although I'm not sure that the "Hood" and its related Gangsta user IDs sounds like my cup o' tea, I'm willing to give it a chance.)
So when will the next "sneak" preview of ENWorld v3.5 be posted here?
As for the controversy posted elsewhere: I disagree that this is just a sneaky excuse to get us to have to reregister on the board, or to renew interest in sagging ENWorld activity. That's just pessimistic market paranoia speaking.
Is it true that we'll no longer be allowed to discuss "broken" ranger rules? I, for one, would applaud such a change, and I don't know why the original ENWorld engineers didn't include that policy in the first version of this message board.
I also like the (hinted at) addition of "Hivemind" and "Pantheon" prestige classes for certain users, and Piratecat's idea for developing other sublevel prestige groups within this community. (Although I'm not sure that the "Hood" and its related Gangsta user IDs sounds like my cup o' tea, I'm willing to give it a chance.)
So when will the next "sneak" preview of ENWorld v3.5 be posted here?
As for the controversy posted elsewhere: I disagree that this is just a sneaky excuse to get us to have to reregister on the board, or to renew interest in sagging ENWorld activity. That's just pessimistic market paranoia speaking.