Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Orryn Emrys" data-source="post: 720996" data-attributes="member: 6799">I apologize if this has already been addressed at some point and I just missed it....&nbsp; I'm preparing to begin a new campaign in which I will be using the Elements of Magic, and one of the spells the mage in the party has selected to start off with is 'Invisibility.'There appears to be a discrepancy, however.&nbsp; On the chart on page 84, the book states that a 0-level 'Disappear' has a duration of 10 minutes per level, but the description below reads as follows: 'As the 2nd-level invisibility spell, except that it only affects you and lasts for exactly 2 rounds.'&nbsp; I am inclined to assume that the '2-round' implementation is the one intended by the text... but the 'Invisible Object' entry (1st-level spell) in the chart also reads '10 minutes/level,' while the 2nd-level 'Invisibility' effect provides a duration of only 1 minute per level.I'm a little confused....&nbsp; Has this issue been addressed?&nbsp; Or am I simply misinterpreting something?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Orryn Emrys, post: 720996, member: 6799"] I apologize if this has already been addressed at some point and I just missed it.... I'm preparing to begin a new campaign in which I will be using the Elements of Magic, and one of the spells the mage in the party has selected to start off with is 'Invisibility.' There appears to be a discrepancy, however. On the chart on page 84, the book states that a 0-level 'Disappear' has a duration of 10 minutes per level, but the description below reads as follows: 'As the 2nd-level invisibility spell, except that it only affects you and lasts for exactly 2 rounds.' I am inclined to assume that the '2-round' implementation is the one intended by the text... but the 'Invisible Object' entry (1st-level spell) in the chart [i]also[/i] reads '10 minutes/level,' while the 2nd-level 'Invisibility' effect provides a duration of only 1 minute per level. I'm a little confused.... Has this issue been addressed? Or am I simply misinterpreting something? [/QUOTE]

Verification