Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[Epic] Feats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pax" data-source="post: 931799" data-attributes="member: 6875"><p><strong>Re: epic feats</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yet, on page 8 of the ELH, is wording which directly and exactly contradicts this, under "Adding A Second Class." Could you explain why the FAQ, and your answer here, are the opposite of what the book says?</p><p></p><p>I mean you no offense, and I doa ppreciate your stopping by ... but it is, IMO, much like the FAQ trying to assert that a LOW roll is good on a to-hit or save: 180 degrees from what the books themselves say.</p><p></p><p>To refresh your memory, the passage I refer to is this one:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Since the section begins by discussing an Epic characetr picking up the <strong>1st</strong> level of a second class, I cannot imagine how that means anything other than the <em>opposite</em> of what you have described here.</p><p></p><p>IOW, according to page 8 of the ELH, a Wizard(21) picking up their 1st level of Fighter, can choose their bonus feat from either the Fighter (PHB) or Epic Fighter (ELH) bonus feat lists.</p><p></p><p>The passage doesn't say your <strong>character</strong>-level granted feat can do so (obviously, no feat gained by sheer dint of <strong>character</strong>-level is limited to a class' specific list). It says <em>when you are restricted to a list of specific feats.</em> That implies a bonus feat from a class. Put together with what that section is discussing, one can only conclude this would be valid for a Wizard(21)/Fighter(1) choosing their bonus feat (gained as a 1st level fighter).</p><p></p><p>Yet your answer is completely the opposite of that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, no, it doesn't. I mean no offense, but I [d]despise[/b] when a FAQ tries to do the job of an Errata. FAQs aren't supposed to <em>change</em> the rules, they are supposed to <em>clarify</em> them.</p><p></p><p>That's what an Errata is for.</p><p></p><p>Seriously; if you want to change what that passage means, do so in an errata. The FAQ should never contradict the rulebook, it should only clarify it. At present, it contradicts the rulebook, as do you (oddly enough, since you're half of the folks credited as authors <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> ).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pax, post: 931799, member: 6875"] [b]Re: epic feats[/b] Yet, on page 8 of the ELH, is wording which directly and exactly contradicts this, under "Adding A Second Class." Could you explain why the FAQ, and your answer here, are the opposite of what the book says? I mean you no offense, and I doa ppreciate your stopping by ... but it is, IMO, much like the FAQ trying to assert that a LOW roll is good on a to-hit or save: 180 degrees from what the books themselves say. To refresh your memory, the passage I refer to is this one: Since the section begins by discussing an Epic characetr picking up the [b]1st[/b] level of a second class, I cannot imagine how that means anything other than the [i]opposite[/i] of what you have described here. IOW, according to page 8 of the ELH, a Wizard(21) picking up their 1st level of Fighter, can choose their bonus feat from either the Fighter (PHB) or Epic Fighter (ELH) bonus feat lists. The passage doesn't say your [b]character[/b]-level granted feat can do so (obviously, no feat gained by sheer dint of [b]character[/b]-level is limited to a class' specific list). It says [i]when you are restricted to a list of specific feats.[/i] That implies a bonus feat from a class. Put together with what that section is discussing, one can only conclude this would be valid for a Wizard(21)/Fighter(1) choosing their bonus feat (gained as a 1st level fighter). Yet your answer is completely the opposite of that. Actually, no, it doesn't. I mean no offense, but I [d]despise[/b] when a FAQ tries to do the job of an Errata. FAQs aren't supposed to [i]change[/i] the rules, they are supposed to [i]clarify[/i] them. That's what an Errata is for. Seriously; if you want to change what that passage means, do so in an errata. The FAQ should never contradict the rulebook, it should only clarify it. At present, it contradicts the rulebook, as do you (oddly enough, since you're half of the folks credited as authors :D ). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[Epic] Feats
Top