Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[Epic] Feats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="green slime" data-source="post: 932393" data-attributes="member: 1325"><p>Hello All.</p><p></p><p>Just to throw my two bits on the flames of contention, not that I'm anything of the stature of the two authors of this rules volume we are discussing, </p><p></p><p>but...</p><p></p><p>Originally I interpreted the passage to be as Andy has explained. Then a huge discussion of this erupted on this very board, at which time it was pointed out BC explaination. At first I was rather certain that to do otherwise would be cheating the single-classed Epic hero of his justly deserved desserts.</p><p></p><p>But then just look at the prerequisites of some of these feats! </p><p></p><p>Secondly, a mage 20/fighter 6 although he might qualify for Epic weapon specialisation, can never by the rules gain four iterative attacks. (for example)(common house rule is to allow the best twenty levels count towards iterative attacks.)</p><p></p><p>Thirdly many multiclassed epic characters will loose out on their bonus Epic class feats for their Epic class Levels, so they will in general be 1-3 Epic level feats behind their singleclassed companions.</p><p></p><p>Fourthly; at these levels, it isn't really about balance (to assume so is ludicrous), its more about flavour. Let the heroes be heroes for goodness sake.</p><p></p><p>So I'm with BC on this one. Just so you people know.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="green slime, post: 932393, member: 1325"] Hello All. Just to throw my two bits on the flames of contention, not that I'm anything of the stature of the two authors of this rules volume we are discussing, but... Originally I interpreted the passage to be as Andy has explained. Then a huge discussion of this erupted on this very board, at which time it was pointed out BC explaination. At first I was rather certain that to do otherwise would be cheating the single-classed Epic hero of his justly deserved desserts. But then just look at the prerequisites of some of these feats! Secondly, a mage 20/fighter 6 although he might qualify for Epic weapon specialisation, can never by the rules gain four iterative attacks. (for example)(common house rule is to allow the best twenty levels count towards iterative attacks.) Thirdly many multiclassed epic characters will loose out on their bonus Epic class feats for their Epic class Levels, so they will in general be 1-3 Epic level feats behind their singleclassed companions. Fourthly; at these levels, it isn't really about balance (to assume so is ludicrous), its more about flavour. Let the heroes be heroes for goodness sake. So I'm with BC on this one. Just so you people know. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[Epic] Feats
Top