Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[Epic] Gaining Spells
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GuardianLurker" data-source="post: 272902" data-attributes="member: 786"><p><strong>Analysis complete</strong></p><p></p><p>Whoogh! That was a lot of numbers.</p><p></p><p>OK, first, here's the raw data :</p><p><a href="http://patriot.net/~glurker/DnD/Analysis/spelllprog.html" target="_blank">http://patriot.net/~glurker/DnD/Analysis/spelllprog.html</a></p><p></p><p>There are some pretty hefty graphics on that page, so it will probably take a while to load. (In fact, unless you're on broadband, you probably shouldn't bother...)</p><p></p><p>Basic upshot: The feat in its current form seems to produce the smoothest curves. The semi-spell casters gain a little more benefit from the pair, since they can gain multiple metamagic spell slots per level from it, while the pure spellcasters will only gain one.</p><p></p><p>Final numbers represent something very close to the maximal progression, as I calculated as if the character spent all of his epic slots on the two feats. Practical spell progression will be much less than this. Even at this "rapid" pace, spell progression is about twice as slow as non-epic levels.</p><p></p><p>Cleric:</p><p>____0__1__2__3__4__5__6__7__8__9</p><p>20__6__5__5__5__5__5__4__4__4__4</p><p>30__9__7__7__7__6__6__5__4__4__4</p><p>40_10__9__7__7__7__7__6__5__5__5</p><p>50_10__9__9__8__8__8__7__7__7__7</p><p>60_11_11_11_10_10_10__8__8__8__8</p><p></p><p>Wizard:</p><p>____0__1__2__3__4__5__6__7__8__9</p><p>20__4__4__4__4__4__4__4__4__4__4</p><p>30__7__6__5__5__5__5__5__4__4__4</p><p>40__8__8__6__6__6__6__6__5__5__5</p><p>50__8__8__8__7__7__7__7__7__7__7</p><p>60_11_10_10__9__9__9__8__8__8__8</p><p></p><p>Sorceror:</p><p>____0__1__2__3__4__5__6__7__8__9</p><p>20__6__6__6__6__6__6__6__6__6__6</p><p>30__9__8__8__8__7__7__7__6__6__6</p><p>40_10_10__8__8__8__8__8__7__7__7</p><p>50_10_10_10__9__9__9__9__9__9__9</p><p>60_13_12_12_11_11_11_10_10_10_10</p><p></p><p>Druid:</p><p>____0__1__2__3__4__5__6__7__8__9</p><p>20__6__5__5__5__5__5__4__4__4__4</p><p>30__8__7__6__6__6__6__4__4__4__4</p><p>40_10__9__9__8__7__6__5__5__5__4</p><p>50_11_10_10__8__7__7__6__6__5__5</p><p>60_12_11_10__9__8__8__7__7__7__6</p><p></p><p>Bard:</p><p>____0__1__2__3__4__5__6__7__8__9</p><p>20__4__4__4__4__4__4__4__0__0__0</p><p>30__7__6__6__6__5__5__4__1__1__1</p><p>40__8__8__7__8__6__5__5__2__2__1</p><p>50__9__9__9__9__8__7__7__3__2__2</p><p>60_10_10_10__9__9__8__7__4__4__4</p><p></p><p>Paladin/Ranger:</p><p>____1__2__3__4__5__6__7__8__9</p><p>20__3__3__3__3__0__0__0__0__0</p><p>30__2__2__2__1__1__1__1__1__0</p><p>40__4__3__3__3__2__2__1__1__1</p><p>50__7__5__4__4__3__3__2__2__2</p><p>60__8__6__5__4__4__4__4__3__3</p><p></p><p>So, now that the numbers are up, opinions?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GuardianLurker, post: 272902, member: 786"] [b]Analysis complete[/b] Whoogh! That was a lot of numbers. OK, first, here's the raw data : [url]http://patriot.net/~glurker/DnD/Analysis/spelllprog.html[/url] There are some pretty hefty graphics on that page, so it will probably take a while to load. (In fact, unless you're on broadband, you probably shouldn't bother...) Basic upshot: The feat in its current form seems to produce the smoothest curves. The semi-spell casters gain a little more benefit from the pair, since they can gain multiple metamagic spell slots per level from it, while the pure spellcasters will only gain one. Final numbers represent something very close to the maximal progression, as I calculated as if the character spent all of his epic slots on the two feats. Practical spell progression will be much less than this. Even at this "rapid" pace, spell progression is about twice as slow as non-epic levels. Cleric: ____0__1__2__3__4__5__6__7__8__9 20__6__5__5__5__5__5__4__4__4__4 30__9__7__7__7__6__6__5__4__4__4 40_10__9__7__7__7__7__6__5__5__5 50_10__9__9__8__8__8__7__7__7__7 60_11_11_11_10_10_10__8__8__8__8 Wizard: ____0__1__2__3__4__5__6__7__8__9 20__4__4__4__4__4__4__4__4__4__4 30__7__6__5__5__5__5__5__4__4__4 40__8__8__6__6__6__6__6__5__5__5 50__8__8__8__7__7__7__7__7__7__7 60_11_10_10__9__9__9__8__8__8__8 Sorceror: ____0__1__2__3__4__5__6__7__8__9 20__6__6__6__6__6__6__6__6__6__6 30__9__8__8__8__7__7__7__6__6__6 40_10_10__8__8__8__8__8__7__7__7 50_10_10_10__9__9__9__9__9__9__9 60_13_12_12_11_11_11_10_10_10_10 Druid: ____0__1__2__3__4__5__6__7__8__9 20__6__5__5__5__5__5__4__4__4__4 30__8__7__6__6__6__6__4__4__4__4 40_10__9__9__8__7__6__5__5__5__4 50_11_10_10__8__7__7__6__6__5__5 60_12_11_10__9__8__8__7__7__7__6 Bard: ____0__1__2__3__4__5__6__7__8__9 20__4__4__4__4__4__4__4__0__0__0 30__7__6__6__6__5__5__4__1__1__1 40__8__8__7__8__6__5__5__2__2__1 50__9__9__9__9__8__7__7__3__2__2 60_10_10_10__9__9__8__7__4__4__4 Paladin/Ranger: ____1__2__3__4__5__6__7__8__9 20__3__3__3__3__0__0__0__0__0 30__2__2__2__1__1__1__1__1__0 40__4__3__3__3__2__2__1__1__1 50__7__5__4__4__3__3__2__2__2 60__8__6__5__4__4__4__4__3__3 So, now that the numbers are up, opinions? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[Epic] Gaining Spells
Top
