Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sepulchrave II" data-source="post: 3035392" data-attributes="member: 4303">Factors are up. This is where the holes start to appear.Thanks for support, Cheiro. I'll answer what I can, but my brain is dead at this point.It's inelegant, and could use revision. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/nervous.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":heh:" title="Nervous Laugh    :heh:" data-shortname=":heh:" /> A spell developed with the seed could create e.g. a ghast - each additional 2HD of ghasts would increase the Spellcraft Prerequisite by +1. On reflection, it might be better to simply allow any corporeal nonextraplanar undead without insisting on a flexibility factor. I admit that animate dead isn't one of my strong points - any alternative wording which is workable is welcome. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/paranoid.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":uhoh:" title="Paranoid    :uhoh:" data-shortname=":uhoh:" /> Create undead and create greater undead were used as the basis for the judgement on these factors - the template adjustment (double the CR adjustment as an additional factor) is semi-arbitrary, but feels about right. Alternative suggestions welcome.Yes, it overrides it - the wording could be clearer. The +60 is a holdover from the old system's adjustment for the summon seed's ability to call unique entities, and is an arbitrary (although not unreasonable, I think) number.Err. Or you could just jack up the Save DC by +30 and add +64d6 damage instead...Probably. I can't really see anyone asking more than 10 questions.It's a holdover from a prior draft. It'll probably crop up again. Keep checking.No. At least, that wasn't my intention. Hence the addition of call.New polymorph rules. I might be missing something.</blockquote>

Verification