Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Archive Forums
Hosted Forums
Personal & Hosted Forums
Hosted Publisher Forums
Dog Soul Hosted Forum
Epic Magic Big Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cheiromancer" data-source="post: 3097177" data-attributes="member: 141"><p>This is for the base 8th level spell, right? (SP 20?) I presume the cleric is calling a pit fiend (CR 20, 18 HD). The "determine specific target creature" should probably be +8; that makes the final SP come out to be 24, and makes the flexibility almost-sweeping.</p><p></p><p>That analysis looks compelling, but it yields a [call] seed that is plainly superior to a [summon] seed. A called CR 14 creature (+8), at short range (-4) and 20 minutes duration (-4) with almost-sweeping flexibility (built in) is SP 24. A summoned CR 14 creature (+4) at short range (-4) and 20 minutes duration (-2) and almost-sweeping flexibility (+8) is SP 30. Add the fact that called creatures are superior to summoned creatures in their capabilities...</p><p></p><p>I think if you added the CR of the called creature in again, (i.e. if this called CR 14 creature were SP 38) then it might be OK. At 24 USP, a CR 8 at long range and 200 minutes duration (or short range and 20 days duration), with +1 CR = +3 SP would do nicely. That's with a great deal of choice (corresponding in value to the almost-sweeping of [summon]). Without it you could probably get another +2 CR; I'd say giving up the choice would be worth a -6 mitigating factor.</p><p></p><p>This flexibility is the big difference between <em>ally</em> and <em>binding</em>, isn't it? Well, a bound outsider is a lot less tractable than an ally. So you pay for the flexibility, but you also have to account for the fact that you can get a max HD creature with a <em>binding</em>, but you'll average a lower CR with the <em>ally</em>. I think SP = CR * 3 works fine.</p><p></p><p>That 8th level spell (SP 20) has -16 points in mitigating factors, -22 given that there isn't a choice, and so on average will get a CR 14 creature. Usually some sort of devil, but elementals aren't unheard of; a pit fiend would be quite rare. The average CR would often be a bit higher, considering that there would normally be ethical sympathy (worth -2 or -4 or so in mitigating factors). Oh, and this is probably a special area of expertise, so probably another -2. A CR 16 average should be expected. That sounds about right.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, I'd suggest that at short range and 20 days duration, [call] yield a CR 8 creature; and that each +1 CR = +3 SP. Unfortunately that makes <em>Call Graz'zt</em> a very difficult USP 90, or 96 if the duration of the call is extended to 20 000 days. Could Fillein and his cabal manage that?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cheiromancer, post: 3097177, member: 141"] This is for the base 8th level spell, right? (SP 20?) I presume the cleric is calling a pit fiend (CR 20, 18 HD). The "determine specific target creature" should probably be +8; that makes the final SP come out to be 24, and makes the flexibility almost-sweeping. That analysis looks compelling, but it yields a [call] seed that is plainly superior to a [summon] seed. A called CR 14 creature (+8), at short range (-4) and 20 minutes duration (-4) with almost-sweeping flexibility (built in) is SP 24. A summoned CR 14 creature (+4) at short range (-4) and 20 minutes duration (-2) and almost-sweeping flexibility (+8) is SP 30. Add the fact that called creatures are superior to summoned creatures in their capabilities... I think if you added the CR of the called creature in again, (i.e. if this called CR 14 creature were SP 38) then it might be OK. At 24 USP, a CR 8 at long range and 200 minutes duration (or short range and 20 days duration), with +1 CR = +3 SP would do nicely. That's with a great deal of choice (corresponding in value to the almost-sweeping of [summon]). Without it you could probably get another +2 CR; I'd say giving up the choice would be worth a -6 mitigating factor. This flexibility is the big difference between [i]ally[/i] and [i]binding[/i], isn't it? Well, a bound outsider is a lot less tractable than an ally. So you pay for the flexibility, but you also have to account for the fact that you can get a max HD creature with a [i]binding[/i], but you'll average a lower CR with the [i]ally[/i]. I think SP = CR * 3 works fine. That 8th level spell (SP 20) has -16 points in mitigating factors, -22 given that there isn't a choice, and so on average will get a CR 14 creature. Usually some sort of devil, but elementals aren't unheard of; a pit fiend would be quite rare. The average CR would often be a bit higher, considering that there would normally be ethical sympathy (worth -2 or -4 or so in mitigating factors). Oh, and this is probably a special area of expertise, so probably another -2. A CR 16 average should be expected. That sounds about right. Anyway, I'd suggest that at short range and 20 days duration, [call] yield a CR 8 creature; and that each +1 CR = +3 SP. Unfortunately that makes [i]Call Graz'zt[/i] a very difficult USP 90, or 96 if the duration of the call is extended to 20 000 days. Could Fillein and his cabal manage that? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Archive Forums
Hosted Forums
Personal & Hosted Forums
Hosted Publisher Forums
Dog Soul Hosted Forum
Epic Magic Big Thread
Top