Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Archive Forums
Hosted Forums
Personal & Hosted Forums
Hosted Publisher Forums
Dog Soul Hosted Forum
Epic Magic Big Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cheiromancer" data-source="post: 3123244" data-attributes="member: 141"><p>:scratches head:</p><p></p><p>So you want regular choices of AMC to be a viable choice for a krustean, but not a jacobean? Jacobeans will have to specialize if they want to be competitive? I don't see how this will work, but I'm sure you have a picture in your mind. How many paths (seeds) could a jacobean wizard be competitive on, assuming he takes those specialist feats? If your thought was that a jacobean could be competitive in one area (<em>disintegrating</em> things) but would be way behind everywhere else (the base curve, before it steps up).... well, I'm sure you don't mean that. But I don't know what else you might mean.</p><p></p><p>Maybe you want a more flavorful diet of feats for the jacobean wizard? I don't really think that a bland diet of feats (all AMC) is necessarily a bad thing. They translate into better epic spells, and there's a lot of fun there. Not that a wizard can't specialize with all kinds of wonderfully named, evocative feats; that's great, too, but I don't think it should be mandatory. And deciding on the benchmarks for those specialist feats; the context has to be what a generalist wizard of the same level can do, doesn't it? In which case it has to be a balanced, viable choice to be a generalist.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cheiromancer, post: 3123244, member: 141"] :scratches head: So you want regular choices of AMC to be a viable choice for a krustean, but not a jacobean? Jacobeans will have to specialize if they want to be competitive? I don't see how this will work, but I'm sure you have a picture in your mind. How many paths (seeds) could a jacobean wizard be competitive on, assuming he takes those specialist feats? If your thought was that a jacobean could be competitive in one area ([i]disintegrating[/i] things) but would be way behind everywhere else (the base curve, before it steps up).... well, I'm sure you don't mean that. But I don't know what else you might mean. Maybe you want a more flavorful diet of feats for the jacobean wizard? I don't really think that a bland diet of feats (all AMC) is necessarily a bad thing. They translate into better epic spells, and there's a lot of fun there. Not that a wizard can't specialize with all kinds of wonderfully named, evocative feats; that's great, too, but I don't think it should be mandatory. And deciding on the benchmarks for those specialist feats; the context has to be what a generalist wizard of the same level can do, doesn't it? In which case it has to be a balanced, viable choice to be a generalist. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Archive Forums
Hosted Forums
Personal & Hosted Forums
Hosted Publisher Forums
Dog Soul Hosted Forum
Epic Magic Big Thread
Top