Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
Archive Forums
Hosted Forums
Personal & Hosted Forums
Hosted Publisher Forums
Dog Soul Hosted Forum
Epic Magic Big Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sepulchrave II" data-source="post: 3138910" data-attributes="member: 4303"><p>Hmm.</p><p></p><p>What if we remove AMC from the jacobean equation altogether - restrict its use to nonepic spells. No empower as a factor.</p><p></p><p>The 50th-level caster (30d6 and 1d6/SP) seed is putting out 59d6 <em>fireballs</em>; these would rise to 236d6 <em>fireballs</em> with a x4 dice HotE-type feat; If he'd loaded up on epic slots (let's assume no +3 cumulative Spellcraft prerequisite), he could dish out 17 of these in a day, if the rest of his feats were Epic Spellcasting.</p><p></p><p>Conversely, the metamagic specialist (MF, Enhance, 18 x AMC) can double-enhance/sextruple empower dbfs in 9th-level slots (7 x 160d6) and double-enhance/quintuple empower dbfs in his 7th & 8th-level slots (15 x 140d6). I'm assuming a non-specialist wizard with an Int of 48, here. An <em>epic ring of wizardry</em> is going to count for a lot, here - there again, who's to say that the jacobean hasn't acquired his <em>big-ass staff of epic mitigation</em> by this point; it probably shouldn't be a consideration.</p><p></p><p>I think pattern this is OK, but it strikes both AMC and the empower factor from the equation. Then again, I've forgotten why AMC was included in the first place for Epic Spellcasting - I suspect that it may have been to moderate the progression of [blast] and [destroy]. </p><p></p><p>At 50th level, 19 x AMC (at -2) can also prompt a Save of 54+ relevant modifiers against the base <em>slay</em> or <em>compel</em> seeds - which may be more of a problem. A Save DC of 75 is quite probably routine for a 50th-level caster under these circumstances - a DC of around 56 (no AMC) seems more reasonable; if a factor which bypassed natural immunities was available for +8, this would fall to 52: this is still pretty solid. </p><p></p><p>A mature adult prismatic dragon (KR 52) has a Fort and Will save of +45. </p><p></p><p>A living vault (KR 49) is a good example, as it's normally immune to [death] and [mind-affecting] effects. It's Fort +32 Will +33 - (suggesting that maybe the factor to penetrate immunities should be stiffer).</p><p></p><p>An elder titan (KR 63) is Fort +47, Will +50</p><p></p><p>I think if we retain AMC, then it will overpower [slay] and [compel]. Not that saves work, at these levels. </p><p></p><p>Sorry for the digression - didn't mean to end up here.</p><p></p><p>How do you feel about reconstructing the monsters in the ELH some time? I wonder if monsters had epic save progressions after 20HD it would help; after all, characters should have regular BAB progressions, right?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sepulchrave II, post: 3138910, member: 4303"] Hmm. What if we remove AMC from the jacobean equation altogether - restrict its use to nonepic spells. No empower as a factor. The 50th-level caster (30d6 and 1d6/SP) seed is putting out 59d6 [I]fireballs[/I]; these would rise to 236d6 [I]fireballs[/I] with a x4 dice HotE-type feat; If he'd loaded up on epic slots (let's assume no +3 cumulative Spellcraft prerequisite), he could dish out 17 of these in a day, if the rest of his feats were Epic Spellcasting. Conversely, the metamagic specialist (MF, Enhance, 18 x AMC) can double-enhance/sextruple empower dbfs in 9th-level slots (7 x 160d6) and double-enhance/quintuple empower dbfs in his 7th & 8th-level slots (15 x 140d6). I'm assuming a non-specialist wizard with an Int of 48, here. An [I]epic ring of wizardry[/I] is going to count for a lot, here - there again, who's to say that the jacobean hasn't acquired his [I]big-ass staff of epic mitigation[/I] by this point; it probably shouldn't be a consideration. I think pattern this is OK, but it strikes both AMC and the empower factor from the equation. Then again, I've forgotten why AMC was included in the first place for Epic Spellcasting - I suspect that it may have been to moderate the progression of [blast] and [destroy]. At 50th level, 19 x AMC (at -2) can also prompt a Save of 54+ relevant modifiers against the base [I]slay[/I] or [I]compel[/I] seeds - which may be more of a problem. A Save DC of 75 is quite probably routine for a 50th-level caster under these circumstances - a DC of around 56 (no AMC) seems more reasonable; if a factor which bypassed natural immunities was available for +8, this would fall to 52: this is still pretty solid. A mature adult prismatic dragon (KR 52) has a Fort and Will save of +45. A living vault (KR 49) is a good example, as it's normally immune to [death] and [mind-affecting] effects. It's Fort +32 Will +33 - (suggesting that maybe the factor to penetrate immunities should be stiffer). An elder titan (KR 63) is Fort +47, Will +50 I think if we retain AMC, then it will overpower [slay] and [compel]. Not that saves work, at these levels. Sorry for the digression - didn't mean to end up here. How do you feel about reconstructing the monsters in the ELH some time? I wonder if monsters had epic save progressions after 20HD it would help; after all, characters should have regular BAB progressions, right? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Archive Forums
Hosted Forums
Personal & Hosted Forums
Hosted Publisher Forums
Dog Soul Hosted Forum
Epic Magic Big Thread
Top