Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sepulchrave II" data-source="post: 3151614" data-attributes="member: 4303">Re: Mordenkainen's DisjunctionLooked it up in 1e Unearthed Arcana - the 3.X MDJ is essentially unchanged  - a problem it shares with many other 9th-level spells. The 1e version only had a 30-ft radius, though  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused    :confused:"  data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /> Here is how I would personally prefer it to be, FWIW:Mage’s DisjunctionAbjurationLevel: Magic 9, Sor/Wiz 9Components: VCasting Time: 1 standard actionRange: TouchTarget: Magic item touchedDuration: InstantaneousSaving Throw: No or Will negates (object); see textSpell Resistance: NoA magic item which you touch is disjoined - separated into its individual magical components, and rendered inert. Potions or scrolls are disjoined with no saving throw. A permanent magic item must make a successful Will save or be turned into a normal item. An item in a creature’s possession uses its own Will save bonus or its possessor’s Will save bonus, whichever is higher.Even artifacts are subject to disjunction, though there is only a 1% chance per caster level of actually affecting such powerful items. Additionally, if an artifact is destroyed, you must make a DC 25 Will save or permanently lose all spellcasting abilities. (These abilities cannot be recovered by mortal magic, not even miracle or wish.)Note: Destroying artifacts is a dangerous business, and it is 95% likely to attract the attention of some powerful being who has an interest in or connection with the device.</blockquote>

Verification