Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="haakon1" data-source="post: 2989942" data-attributes="member: 25619">Umm, no.  I'm wholeheartedly against 4e.  I know some people live and die by additional "crunch", making their game extra complicated each month, and love changing all the rules around every couple of years.I'm completely the opposite.  I want a stable rule base, so I can memorize the rules even though I play infrequently (equivalent of once a month).  I do want new rules.  I don't want the dozens of modules I've bought to plunder ideas or put together into campaign arcs to be wrecked so I have to do a lot of rework or more likely just toss them.  I don't want my players to have to buy new books.  So I don't want to switch.  And maybe I won't . . . 3.5e is broken in that it's overly complicated, but my campaigns have a lot of legacy now.I only "downgraded" from 1e to 3.0e in 2002 . . . I skipped 2e entirely as a DM.  I'm thinking there's no reason to "downgrade" again . . . WOTC should find a better way of getting my money than annoying me with new editions.  I'd be happy to pay a monthly license fee, if they'd only stop messing up the game every few years.  No WOTC products at all is superior to 4e.</blockquote>