Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Essentials classes question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fba827" data-source="post: 5391251" data-attributes="member: 807"><p>That's a subjective answer. They do play differently. Whether that's easier or not is a matter of preference and play style.</p><p></p><p>For instance, with the uniform power progression of the original PHBs, it makes it easier to pick up any class and go right at it or have one player be able to easily answer questions for other players about their progression/powers. But with the HotF* books, the progression is different for each class so it takes more effort to try a different class or for your fellow players to know off hand what the others are/aren't capable of without doing actual research.</p><p></p><p>Having said that, in my opinion, in general the HotF* classes are 'simpler' Though no more or no less 'easier'</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not sure if they generate fewer conditions -- it depends a lot on what powers the players choose. But there is a little less condition tracking in that some of the marks and curses have been redone as auras so you'll have at least a couple less things to keep track of. Of course, if you don't have any defenders or warlocks to begin with, then you won't really see that change come in to play at your table.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ah, that's a hard one to answer as a blanket response because all the classes have different progressions now.</p><p></p><p>martial classes in particular have fewer.</p><p>Some of the classes get more frequent uses of a single encounter power rather than multiple different types of encounter powers.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I will say that some of the HotF* class builds are designed better in terms of attribute requirements - such as the paladin. In the PHB, some of the paladin builds require a spread of 3 'good or better' ability scores. Compared to the HotFK paladin builds which require a spread of 2 'good or better' ability scores, allowing for more specialization.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Both essentials and nonessentials classes work fine next to each other. So if you want, just open the option of HotF* classes to the players. Some may like it, some may not, but you'll give them the option rather than requiring it one way or the other.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fba827, post: 5391251, member: 807"] That's a subjective answer. They do play differently. Whether that's easier or not is a matter of preference and play style. For instance, with the uniform power progression of the original PHBs, it makes it easier to pick up any class and go right at it or have one player be able to easily answer questions for other players about their progression/powers. But with the HotF* books, the progression is different for each class so it takes more effort to try a different class or for your fellow players to know off hand what the others are/aren't capable of without doing actual research. Having said that, in my opinion, in general the HotF* classes are 'simpler' Though no more or no less 'easier' Not sure if they generate fewer conditions -- it depends a lot on what powers the players choose. But there is a little less condition tracking in that some of the marks and curses have been redone as auras so you'll have at least a couple less things to keep track of. Of course, if you don't have any defenders or warlocks to begin with, then you won't really see that change come in to play at your table. Ah, that's a hard one to answer as a blanket response because all the classes have different progressions now. martial classes in particular have fewer. Some of the classes get more frequent uses of a single encounter power rather than multiple different types of encounter powers. I will say that some of the HotF* class builds are designed better in terms of attribute requirements - such as the paladin. In the PHB, some of the paladin builds require a spread of 3 'good or better' ability scores. Compared to the HotFK paladin builds which require a spread of 2 'good or better' ability scores, allowing for more specialization. Both essentials and nonessentials classes work fine next to each other. So if you want, just open the option of HotF* classes to the players. Some may like it, some may not, but you'll give them the option rather than requiring it one way or the other. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Essentials classes question
Top