Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Essentials feat too powerful???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 5460245" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Mathematically it's astronomically against that happening. How many single characters have you played for 90 consecutive levels? Granted, the math I used was only from all three tiers of the Monster Manual and other books have other ratios of monsters with a Daze or Stun attack against Will, and/or his DM could be throwing Daze and Stun capable monsters at the group every encounter. But, the feat has only been out for what, 6 months?</p><p></p><p>Remember, he was only talking Daze and Stun, not Dominate. And, there are Fort attacks that do Daze and Stun as well, but he was only talking Will Defense versus those two specific conditions.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm not saying that it didn't happen to him, I'm just saying that the odds of it happening to anyone else are extremely small, so his example doesn't really illustrate his point.</p><p></p><p>Even if one monster in the normal five that the DM throws at the group does only a Daze or Stun vs. Will attack on every single round in every single encounter, that would be 1 attack in 5 being a Daze/Stun Will attack, 8 NPC attacks against a PC per encounter, 8 combat encounters per level, and 15% average bonus by Superior Will at Paragon; we're still talking 5 levels. Assuming of course that the PCs wouldn't wipe out such a foe in the first 2 rounds, so that makes it 20 levels to have this happen 9 times.</p><p></p><p>The odds are against it happening as frequently for anyone else.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Theme or no theme, being saved from Stun or Daze 9 times due a single +2 to +4 is not something that going to happen to most PCs. And if the DM is throwing multiple Daze or Stun vs. Will opponents against the PCs in encounter after encounter, he's more or less forcing all of the players to take feats like Superior Will and basically removing feat choice selection from the hands of his players due to the deadliness of the campaign.</p><p></p><p>And if the DM is doing this, one has to wonder how many times the PC has gotten Dazed or Stunned because of good DM rolling in such a campaign.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Many of us have played encounters where a given foe can Stun multiple times in a single encounter and we learned that it is ZERO fun for the players. So, most reasonable DMs shy away from it. Daze is a different story, but Stunned is a condition that many DMs save for the proper moment (like climatic fights) and even then, it's not something that most DMs throw a lot of at the players.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 5460245, member: 2011"] Mathematically it's astronomically against that happening. How many single characters have you played for 90 consecutive levels? Granted, the math I used was only from all three tiers of the Monster Manual and other books have other ratios of monsters with a Daze or Stun attack against Will, and/or his DM could be throwing Daze and Stun capable monsters at the group every encounter. But, the feat has only been out for what, 6 months? Remember, he was only talking Daze and Stun, not Dominate. And, there are Fort attacks that do Daze and Stun as well, but he was only talking Will Defense versus those two specific conditions. I'm not saying that it didn't happen to him, I'm just saying that the odds of it happening to anyone else are extremely small, so his example doesn't really illustrate his point. Even if one monster in the normal five that the DM throws at the group does only a Daze or Stun vs. Will attack on every single round in every single encounter, that would be 1 attack in 5 being a Daze/Stun Will attack, 8 NPC attacks against a PC per encounter, 8 combat encounters per level, and 15% average bonus by Superior Will at Paragon; we're still talking 5 levels. Assuming of course that the PCs wouldn't wipe out such a foe in the first 2 rounds, so that makes it 20 levels to have this happen 9 times. The odds are against it happening as frequently for anyone else. Theme or no theme, being saved from Stun or Daze 9 times due a single +2 to +4 is not something that going to happen to most PCs. And if the DM is throwing multiple Daze or Stun vs. Will opponents against the PCs in encounter after encounter, he's more or less forcing all of the players to take feats like Superior Will and basically removing feat choice selection from the hands of his players due to the deadliness of the campaign. And if the DM is doing this, one has to wonder how many times the PC has gotten Dazed or Stunned because of good DM rolling in such a campaign. Many of us have played encounters where a given foe can Stun multiple times in a single encounter and we learned that it is ZERO fun for the players. So, most reasonable DMs shy away from it. Daze is a different story, but Stunned is a condition that many DMs save for the proper moment (like climatic fights) and even then, it's not something that most DMs throw a lot of at the players. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Essentials feat too powerful???
Top