Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Essentials has me hyped about D&D again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="buddhafrog" data-source="post: 5510796" data-attributes="member: 86605"><p>Exactly, and True, and I have been using mostly martial characters for the players, but not all. </p><p></p><p>I agree that characters generally advance and use the same powers their entire lives - which maybe is my point. While 4e might generally offer 2(w) + condition damage across the board for many Lvl 3 Encounter powers, I felt Essentials' leveling powers stayed more clearly within the theme of that character. For example, if I'm a Knight, my 3rd Lvl just means I'm still defending and trying to get in the middle of everyone - only I do it with a little more skill; I haven't learned a newer, deadlier attack, I'm just a little better at what I was already doing. While this provides less choices of powers per leveling, I felt that it provided more immersion in how a particular character might improve as a knight - and thus to me was more player-focused and not power-focused. To me it played more like APG, which I liked and was a little surprised to experience.</p><p></p><p>And I'm not knocking 4e - picking up D&D and playing 4e after a 25 year absence was one of the best decisions I've made in the last decade. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Two points: 1) we obviously run different games, which is pie, probably pecan. 2) I rarely have an encounter that ends with someone close to zero HP. My encounters are also deadly. But while you might use the full surges to start fresh, I don't, meaning that our next encounters might be different strength but both end up with our players fearing death and at around the same HP level. Both work. Since we have less encounters per day than suggested, I just found that encounter survival was the only key - no longer term planning. Limiting surges added more longer term planning a I felt a little dark realism - b/c we all know that D&D is about realism.</p><p></p><p>The reason I use my system is 1) healing surges feel a little too magical to me, and I like to provide a more lasting effect to damage. I want players leaving their village to feel strong and invincible, but players waking up for the third consecutive night in a dungeon to feel like they're exhausted and afraid and second guessing themselves. 2) b/c I want players to have a little more sense of debate - "should we rest, where can we rest safely?", "should we attack here or find another way around?". There were increased battle tactics of keeping weaker players a little more protected and flanked which provided changes b/t encounters. </p><p></p><p>I try to make my system gritty and dark. It might not be accurate, but that is the theme I'm trying to get players to feel.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="buddhafrog, post: 5510796, member: 86605"] Exactly, and True, and I have been using mostly martial characters for the players, but not all. I agree that characters generally advance and use the same powers their entire lives - which maybe is my point. While 4e might generally offer 2(w) + condition damage across the board for many Lvl 3 Encounter powers, I felt Essentials' leveling powers stayed more clearly within the theme of that character. For example, if I'm a Knight, my 3rd Lvl just means I'm still defending and trying to get in the middle of everyone - only I do it with a little more skill; I haven't learned a newer, deadlier attack, I'm just a little better at what I was already doing. While this provides less choices of powers per leveling, I felt that it provided more immersion in how a particular character might improve as a knight - and thus to me was more player-focused and not power-focused. To me it played more like APG, which I liked and was a little surprised to experience. And I'm not knocking 4e - picking up D&D and playing 4e after a 25 year absence was one of the best decisions I've made in the last decade. Two points: 1) we obviously run different games, which is pie, probably pecan. 2) I rarely have an encounter that ends with someone close to zero HP. My encounters are also deadly. But while you might use the full surges to start fresh, I don't, meaning that our next encounters might be different strength but both end up with our players fearing death and at around the same HP level. Both work. Since we have less encounters per day than suggested, I just found that encounter survival was the only key - no longer term planning. Limiting surges added more longer term planning a I felt a little dark realism - b/c we all know that D&D is about realism. The reason I use my system is 1) healing surges feel a little too magical to me, and I like to provide a more lasting effect to damage. I want players leaving their village to feel strong and invincible, but players waking up for the third consecutive night in a dungeon to feel like they're exhausted and afraid and second guessing themselves. 2) b/c I want players to have a little more sense of debate - "should we rest, where can we rest safely?", "should we attack here or find another way around?". There were increased battle tactics of keeping weaker players a little more protected and flanked which provided changes b/t encounters. I try to make my system gritty and dark. It might not be accurate, but that is the theme I'm trying to get players to feel. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Essentials has me hyped about D&D again
Top