Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Essentials isn't 4.5e, but is 4e as we know it over?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5250735" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>You're still missing my point. The BRV and Tempest fighters opened up new archetypes of character. They are certainly mechanically distinct in class feature from the PHB1 fighters, but the important point is YOU COULDN'T MAKE THAT TYPE OF CHARACTER before MP1 came out. </p><p></p><p>Now, go look at the PHB1 STR cleric and the Essentials Warpriest. When you make one or the other you're making a character that portrays the same archetype, a priest of a god that wears heavy armor and wades into melee combat, healing and supporting his allies with divine power. Its the SAME TYPE OF CHARACTER. This is the difference between the Power book builds and the Essentials builds.</p><p></p><p>Essentials is going back over territory ALREADY COVERED BY 4E and making improved versions of what we had already. This IS a significant difference because when you have that overlap then you have to admit that there's less reason to use the old builds. Nobody was deciding not to use a GWT fighter anymore if they wanted that type of character that was THE build and BRV was different. They might not be vastly different and some people might have said "Eh, I think I want to be a Battlerager now instead of a Weapon Talent type fighter." but they don't directly overlap.</p><p></p><p>Now, when you come right down to it there's some 'competition' between different builds in any game. People choose one or another and the more there are the less any given one will be used. Its just the overlap with Essentials is a lot greater. </p><p></p><p>And how soon the board forgets. I LIKE the idea of Essentials. I'm not arguing anything against it, calling it '4.5' or any other silliness. Its fine. I just think its a shame that the warlord got left out and with the degree of overlap between the PHB and Essentials books I DO think the PHB1 builds will be ghettoized. People can still play them and they have plenty of support etc etc etc. They're still going to become the sort of red haired stepchild of the system, and if Warlord doesn't get a refresh its not going to see a lot of play anymore over time IMHO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 5250735, member: 82106"] You're still missing my point. The BRV and Tempest fighters opened up new archetypes of character. They are certainly mechanically distinct in class feature from the PHB1 fighters, but the important point is YOU COULDN'T MAKE THAT TYPE OF CHARACTER before MP1 came out. Now, go look at the PHB1 STR cleric and the Essentials Warpriest. When you make one or the other you're making a character that portrays the same archetype, a priest of a god that wears heavy armor and wades into melee combat, healing and supporting his allies with divine power. Its the SAME TYPE OF CHARACTER. This is the difference between the Power book builds and the Essentials builds. Essentials is going back over territory ALREADY COVERED BY 4E and making improved versions of what we had already. This IS a significant difference because when you have that overlap then you have to admit that there's less reason to use the old builds. Nobody was deciding not to use a GWT fighter anymore if they wanted that type of character that was THE build and BRV was different. They might not be vastly different and some people might have said "Eh, I think I want to be a Battlerager now instead of a Weapon Talent type fighter." but they don't directly overlap. Now, when you come right down to it there's some 'competition' between different builds in any game. People choose one or another and the more there are the less any given one will be used. Its just the overlap with Essentials is a lot greater. And how soon the board forgets. I LIKE the idea of Essentials. I'm not arguing anything against it, calling it '4.5' or any other silliness. Its fine. I just think its a shame that the warlord got left out and with the degree of overlap between the PHB and Essentials books I DO think the PHB1 builds will be ghettoized. People can still play them and they have plenty of support etc etc etc. They're still going to become the sort of red haired stepchild of the system, and if Warlord doesn't get a refresh its not going to see a lot of play anymore over time IMHO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Essentials isn't 4.5e, but is 4e as we know it over?
Top