Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Essentials -- What happened to Rituals?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="catastrophic" data-source="post: 5414530" data-attributes="member: 81381"><p>It's not jsut a psychologicla barrier, it's a logistical cost. The actual cost of muddling out all that stuff is clearly non-trivial. I mean i put a lot of effort into the two games i run, but i still look at rituals and even treasure and go "ughhhhh". I eyeball XP as well. </p><p> </p><p>But that happens anwyay. Have you looked at the cheaper rituals? How easy it is for say, mid paragon tier PCs to use lower level divinations all damn day? Not to mention knock. There are penty of rituals that stomp all over the game in their current form, especially if they get used a lot ocne their casting cost becomes trivial. </p><p> </p><p>Because I didn't pay the people who made the game to show me a mirror and smirk. And again, i'd much rather spare all those clock cycles for the cool stuff rules can't do, like story.</p><p> </p><p>And to be frank, endlessly eyeballing rituals is high dubious- you can very quickly end up playing 'giant eagle divebomb mission' every week instead of D&D. And i say this as somebody who has done combats with the pcs on the backs of their giant spirit eagles several times. A system that gives some guidelines will allow a GM and PC to improv with an item or ritual far more effectivly than one that lacks them. And page 48 is not enough- just give items and rituals a power level and a few keywords, and that allows improvisation, but also gives a solid frame fo refrence to help incorperate those actions into the game in a balanced way.</p><p> </p><p>Yes, but ad&d was a vastly inferior version of the game. </p><p> </p><p>I'm sorry, i'm not one of these people who have decided to spin the failures of past editions as merits, or pretend that 4e has 'narrowed' d&d. 4e is better, period. All 4e does is free up more of my improv time for the places it can be put to best use- characters, situations, plot, and of course, incorperating player input. </p><p> </p><p>Then we disagree. Rituals need an overhaul and making them comparable to items is a good first step to fixing both. </p><p> </p><p>People say this a lot, but i've never seen it happen. If anything, having clear abilities for a ritual just gives you a better frame of refrence to adjudicate other uses.</p><p> </p><p>No, they should not. In fact id' say that 'this kind of thing' is a terribly narrow notion of how players can be creative, and I see too much of it in threads like this. Players and gms should not be expected to improv basic things that the system should give them a framework and give them hooks on. The system should be helping them do that.</p><p> </p><p>Players get to be creative in all sorts of ways, as does the GM. we should not limit them to 'dungeon logic' or anything similar, and that's what you're doing if you insist that the system must be cast aside in key situations. The system is meant to be there to help. The system exists to give us a framework so that we can work less to have more fun. A system is a lever used to make our creative work more effective in the pursuit of fun. Tossing it aside is not a merit, it's just a vestige of the days when systems were more badly designed.</p><p> </p><p>I disagree. You're making assumptions about play, that serve your viewpoint, but are hardly verified. I've seen heaps of cases of people using system as a springboard for creativity and improvisation. </p><p> </p><p>Funny, my response was "The system isn't helping to do this? And people are saying that's a good thing? Lol what kind of terrible systems have they been playing with? Oh. . oh that's right." And then I have a flashback to my days playing 3e.</p><p> </p><p>Tossing the system aside is a thing you do when the system is bad. A good system does not restrict options, it adds to them- people can still improv, and their ability to do so is only enhanced by a well made system. As an example of what I mean, consider a flame blade. </p><p> </p><p>Give it a general power rating equal to it's level, and put in some guidelines on a brief universal table, and a GM and player can use that as a rule of thumb that's going to make it a lot easier for them to not only improvise with the item, but do so in a way that prevents the item (or ritual or whatever) from hyjacking the situation and overshadowing the controbutions of other players.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="catastrophic, post: 5414530, member: 81381"] It's not jsut a psychologicla barrier, it's a logistical cost. The actual cost of muddling out all that stuff is clearly non-trivial. I mean i put a lot of effort into the two games i run, but i still look at rituals and even treasure and go "ughhhhh". I eyeball XP as well. But that happens anwyay. Have you looked at the cheaper rituals? How easy it is for say, mid paragon tier PCs to use lower level divinations all damn day? Not to mention knock. There are penty of rituals that stomp all over the game in their current form, especially if they get used a lot ocne their casting cost becomes trivial. Because I didn't pay the people who made the game to show me a mirror and smirk. And again, i'd much rather spare all those clock cycles for the cool stuff rules can't do, like story. And to be frank, endlessly eyeballing rituals is high dubious- you can very quickly end up playing 'giant eagle divebomb mission' every week instead of D&D. And i say this as somebody who has done combats with the pcs on the backs of their giant spirit eagles several times. A system that gives some guidelines will allow a GM and PC to improv with an item or ritual far more effectivly than one that lacks them. And page 48 is not enough- just give items and rituals a power level and a few keywords, and that allows improvisation, but also gives a solid frame fo refrence to help incorperate those actions into the game in a balanced way. Yes, but ad&d was a vastly inferior version of the game. I'm sorry, i'm not one of these people who have decided to spin the failures of past editions as merits, or pretend that 4e has 'narrowed' d&d. 4e is better, period. All 4e does is free up more of my improv time for the places it can be put to best use- characters, situations, plot, and of course, incorperating player input. Then we disagree. Rituals need an overhaul and making them comparable to items is a good first step to fixing both. People say this a lot, but i've never seen it happen. If anything, having clear abilities for a ritual just gives you a better frame of refrence to adjudicate other uses. No, they should not. In fact id' say that 'this kind of thing' is a terribly narrow notion of how players can be creative, and I see too much of it in threads like this. Players and gms should not be expected to improv basic things that the system should give them a framework and give them hooks on. The system should be helping them do that. Players get to be creative in all sorts of ways, as does the GM. we should not limit them to 'dungeon logic' or anything similar, and that's what you're doing if you insist that the system must be cast aside in key situations. The system is meant to be there to help. The system exists to give us a framework so that we can work less to have more fun. A system is a lever used to make our creative work more effective in the pursuit of fun. Tossing it aside is not a merit, it's just a vestige of the days when systems were more badly designed. I disagree. You're making assumptions about play, that serve your viewpoint, but are hardly verified. I've seen heaps of cases of people using system as a springboard for creativity and improvisation. Funny, my response was "The system isn't helping to do this? And people are saying that's a good thing? Lol what kind of terrible systems have they been playing with? Oh. . oh that's right." And then I have a flashback to my days playing 3e. Tossing the system aside is a thing you do when the system is bad. A good system does not restrict options, it adds to them- people can still improv, and their ability to do so is only enhanced by a well made system. As an example of what I mean, consider a flame blade. Give it a general power rating equal to it's level, and put in some guidelines on a brief universal table, and a GM and player can use that as a rule of thumb that's going to make it a lot easier for them to not only improvise with the item, but do so in a way that prevents the item (or ritual or whatever) from hyjacking the situation and overshadowing the controbutions of other players. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Essentials -- What happened to Rituals?
Top