Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sol.Dragonheart" data-source="post: 4024909" data-attributes="member: 54316">To clarify my position, I think the Warlocks actions were more borne of a sense of expediency, not any maliciousness on his part.  As in, the Lizard has proved due to his reticence/refusal to identify traps in the area, and calling for aid, that he is no longer of use to us, and is in fact a liability.  As such, eliminating him now saves time and trouble, and we can proceed with the mission.  This is not E, but nor is it G.  It's solidly N, and the fact he did it without consulting the rest of the party and solely on his own judgment is C.  So, he's doing a good job staying consistent with his character as it was stated he is CN.  However, the actions he has taken are in conflict with a LG characters sense of responsibility, justice, and fair/equitable treatment of others, so the LG character is perfectly in character and in the right to confront him about it.  And I think he should, or the player should consider how to adapt to having a character who will violate his sense of morality on a semi-consistent basis.Personally, I would be more concerned about a possibly maleovelent Demonic Blackguard than a pragmatic Warlock, but the point of contention is the Warlock, for the moment.</blockquote>