Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Margaiaman" data-source="post: 311043" data-attributes="member: 2134">Actually yes.Yes...I bought it on the understanding that it would be useful in that regard.I guess its why I'm not a programer, but I don't see why class features are tied so tightly to the class that they cannot be moved to another class.Is it truely that difficult to have created the program with the features of the classes divorced from the classes themselves?It seems to my mind a simple thing.One box with all the features, another with all of the classess.&nbsp; The classess draw from the feature box, but the feature box does not draw from the classess box.&nbsp;&nbsp; Thus when a new class is made it can draw from the same feature box without trouble.Again I'm not a programer, so since it seems like it should be a simple thing I feel like I am being taken advantage of by those who have made the program.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Margaiaman, post: 311043, member: 2134"] [b]Actually yes.[/b] Yes...I bought it on the understanding that it would be useful in that regard. I guess its why I'm not a programer, but I don't see why class features are tied so tightly to the class that they cannot be moved to another class. Is it truely that difficult to have created the program with the features of the classes divorced from the classes themselves? It seems to my mind a simple thing. One box with all the features, another with all of the classess. The classess draw from the feature box, but the feature box does not draw from the classess box. Thus when a new class is made it can draw from the same feature box without trouble. Again I'm not a programer, so since it seems like it should be a simple thing I feel like I am being taken advantage of by those who have made the program. [/QUOTE]

Verification