Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
[EU] So, what in EU is worth it
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wingsandsword" data-source="post: 2278709" data-attributes="member: 14159"><p>Even then, only some of the details of the Death Star's construction. It's still perfectly feasible that Tarkin had his little secret Maw facility working on a lot of the technical problems the Geonosians didn't work out or places where the Empire thought they could improve upon the design. The basic idea that the Death Star's operating philosophy was the Tarkin Doctrine, to rule by fear of force rather than the use of force by presenting such a powerful weapon that no defense is possible is still valid. Building it in the Horuz system, over Despayre is still valid, and the secret Maw installation in the Kessel system is still valid as a place for some early prototype work and R&D on the design. </p><p></p><p>Also, note that the Kaminoan clones did take some quite som time to grow and mature, just like Spaarti grown clones (without Yslimiri help), the movies never implied that you could just pop out clone armies with the push of a button. Spaarti technology may be a different implementation than Kaminoan cloning, but the basic ideas don't contradict.</p><p></p><p>In general, I think the prequels were quite kind to the EU in not contradicting anything major. Even the controversial Dark Empire series was supported by Palpatine's declaration that he knew a way to cheat death (I know some people hate DE, but right there in the movie he says he knows how to cheat death, and the believed-dead villain returning is a staple of pulp adventure, which Star Wars tries to be). Only Boba Fett's backstory (of which there were already several conflicting stories) was really ignoring the EU. </p><p></p><p>The Prequels actually took a few things that were originally created for the EU and made them Canon. The name Coruscant was created by Timothy Zahn for Heir to the Empire and the rest of the Thrawn novels, and Lucas decided to adopt it (replacing his original idea of calling the city-world capitol of the Empire either Jhantor or Had Abbadon). Some fans like to look down on the EU as not canon (which by the strictest of definitions, it isn't), but Lucas himself is well aware of what's in the EU, the general direction things take, and he has exercised veto power over plot developments he disapproved of (Joruus C'boath was originally going to be a clone of Obi-Wan, but Lucas said no way). The EU may not be strict canon, but Lucas paid attention to it in creating the prequels.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wingsandsword, post: 2278709, member: 14159"] Even then, only some of the details of the Death Star's construction. It's still perfectly feasible that Tarkin had his little secret Maw facility working on a lot of the technical problems the Geonosians didn't work out or places where the Empire thought they could improve upon the design. The basic idea that the Death Star's operating philosophy was the Tarkin Doctrine, to rule by fear of force rather than the use of force by presenting such a powerful weapon that no defense is possible is still valid. Building it in the Horuz system, over Despayre is still valid, and the secret Maw installation in the Kessel system is still valid as a place for some early prototype work and R&D on the design. Also, note that the Kaminoan clones did take some quite som time to grow and mature, just like Spaarti grown clones (without Yslimiri help), the movies never implied that you could just pop out clone armies with the push of a button. Spaarti technology may be a different implementation than Kaminoan cloning, but the basic ideas don't contradict. In general, I think the prequels were quite kind to the EU in not contradicting anything major. Even the controversial Dark Empire series was supported by Palpatine's declaration that he knew a way to cheat death (I know some people hate DE, but right there in the movie he says he knows how to cheat death, and the believed-dead villain returning is a staple of pulp adventure, which Star Wars tries to be). Only Boba Fett's backstory (of which there were already several conflicting stories) was really ignoring the EU. The Prequels actually took a few things that were originally created for the EU and made them Canon. The name Coruscant was created by Timothy Zahn for Heir to the Empire and the rest of the Thrawn novels, and Lucas decided to adopt it (replacing his original idea of calling the city-world capitol of the Empire either Jhantor or Had Abbadon). Some fans like to look down on the EU as not canon (which by the strictest of definitions, it isn't), but Lucas himself is well aware of what's in the EU, the general direction things take, and he has exercised veto power over plot developments he disapproved of (Joruus C'boath was originally going to be a clone of Obi-Wan, but Lucas said no way). The EU may not be strict canon, but Lucas paid attention to it in creating the prequels. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
[EU] So, what in EU is worth it
Top