Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lorehead" data-source="post: 2867817" data-attributes="member: 40086"><a href="http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=162634" target="_blank">The idea of splitting XP between classes is incompatible with the 3E XP chart.</a>  Neither is any other proportional XP penalty.  If anything, it is probably less self-consistent than the RAW: once we accept that training as either a wizard or a fighter improves your survivability and combat skill, it's inconsistent for a wizard who first trains as a fighter, or a fighter who first trains as a wizard, to sometimes do so and sometimes not.I would recommend that, if you have your heart set on AD&D-style multi-classing in 3E, you assign gestalt characters a LA.  That more accurately replicates the effect of the AD&D multi-classing rules than a literal translation does.</blockquote>