Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Everyone Should Play Custom Lineage by Default
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 8148788" data-attributes="member: 6987520"><p>Yes, there is a lot to digest in this thread and many points of view, so I have no problem explaining my position:</p><p></p><p>PCs can be expressed through role-playing. For me this isn't just about race, but also all the numerous subclasses, etc. that I feel are bloat to a game that <em>should</em> be lean, allowing the player's imagination do be more engaged and work with the DM. 5E is all about rulings and not so much rules, so in that light why do I need a subclass to say my PC is a swashbuckler when I can just choose to role-play him that way and have him do things I think a swashbuckler should do?</p><p></p><p>In the same way, if I want to play a smart dwarf, I can simply put my highest score in INT and now I am a smart dwarf. Pretty simple. I can still be strong and hearty (say a mountain dwarf) and still be smart. I don't need to be able to move the racial ASIs around. I am old-school, so I like the idea Elves are dexterous, Half-Orcs are strong, etc. If you want to deviate in a way, you can put your lowest score wherever your +2 is. So, my dwarf might have an STR 10 (8+2), DEX 10, CON 14 (12+2), INT 15, WIS 13, CHA 14. Sure, I have a +2 for my wizard stuff instead of a +3, but for me that is hardly the end of the world and I don't need custom-freeform rules to make me "happy" with my PC.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, the other issue I take with Custom Lineage is darkvision for everyone! Hoo-rah! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> Too many races already have darkvision and being too common makes it less special and makes darkness less impactful in the game. Darkness is <em>supposed</em> to be scary for PCs, who are wandering around in a little zone of light and have no idea of what horrors lurk in the darkness ahead.</p><p></p><p>So, who is going to take a <em>single</em> skill over darkvision??? I am sure there are some, but IMO most people will choose darkvision without hesitation.</p><p></p><p>All these adjustments to race are poor design IMO, but from WotC I am hardly surprised at this point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DND_Reborn, post: 8148788, member: 6987520"] Yes, there is a lot to digest in this thread and many points of view, so I have no problem explaining my position: PCs can be expressed through role-playing. For me this isn't just about race, but also all the numerous subclasses, etc. that I feel are bloat to a game that [I]should[/I] be lean, allowing the player's imagination do be more engaged and work with the DM. 5E is all about rulings and not so much rules, so in that light why do I need a subclass to say my PC is a swashbuckler when I can just choose to role-play him that way and have him do things I think a swashbuckler should do? In the same way, if I want to play a smart dwarf, I can simply put my highest score in INT and now I am a smart dwarf. Pretty simple. I can still be strong and hearty (say a mountain dwarf) and still be smart. I don't need to be able to move the racial ASIs around. I am old-school, so I like the idea Elves are dexterous, Half-Orcs are strong, etc. If you want to deviate in a way, you can put your lowest score wherever your +2 is. So, my dwarf might have an STR 10 (8+2), DEX 10, CON 14 (12+2), INT 15, WIS 13, CHA 14. Sure, I have a +2 for my wizard stuff instead of a +3, but for me that is hardly the end of the world and I don't need custom-freeform rules to make me "happy" with my PC. Anyway, the other issue I take with Custom Lineage is darkvision for everyone! Hoo-rah! :rolleyes: Too many races already have darkvision and being too common makes it less special and makes darkness less impactful in the game. Darkness is [I]supposed[/I] to be scary for PCs, who are wandering around in a little zone of light and have no idea of what horrors lurk in the darkness ahead. So, who is going to take a [I]single[/I] skill over darkvision??? I am sure there are some, but IMO most people will choose darkvision without hesitation. All these adjustments to race are poor design IMO, but from WotC I am hardly surprised at this point. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Everyone Should Play Custom Lineage by Default
Top