Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 5705494" data-attributes="member: 177">Non-evil is vulnerable, yes.&nbsp; But I don't think they are just as vulnerable.Neutral characters are usually not pursuing things for sake of principle or ideals (like Good characters tend to do) but they still have some moral governors (unlike Evil ones).&nbsp; So, your neutral character isn't apt to come to blows over a difference of opinion.And, if you've got a bunch of Good characters, you can usually rely on them generally wanting to move in the same vague direction.&nbsp; If you've put an Evil out there, they want to stop it, make the world a better place.&nbsp; They may not agree on how, but they'll more often agree there's a problem they all want to address.Evil characters aren't restricted from beating the tar out of you (usually, willingness to kill to get things out of their way is part of what makes them Evil), nor do they have the unifying goal of wanting to make the world a better place.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 5705494, member: 177"] Non-evil is vulnerable, yes. But I don't think they are just as vulnerable. Neutral characters are usually not pursuing things for sake of principle or ideals (like Good characters tend to do) but they still have some moral governors (unlike Evil ones). So, your neutral character isn't apt to come to blows over a difference of opinion. And, if you've got a bunch of Good characters, you can usually rely on them generally wanting to move in the same vague direction. If you've put an Evil out there, they want to stop it, make the world a better place. They may not agree on how, but they'll more often agree there's a problem they all want to address. Evil characters aren't restricted from beating the tar out of you (usually, willingness to kill to get things out of their way is part of what makes them Evil), nor do they have the unifying goal of wanting to make the world a better place. [/QUOTE]

Verification