Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="irdeggman" data-source="post: 2448173" data-attributes="member: 16285">I have to disagree IMO this is most definitely a code of conduct.Per the SRD:Now it is either a code of conduct for the deity (see ex-clerics) or part of a code of conduct the cleric has assumed by taking an alignment (e.g., lawful in this case). This is true even though the character might not have developed a specific and detailed code of conduct but follows along the same path as a paladin having one. So a cleric has one too, just usually less prescriptive. Who are you and what did you do to Hyp?  This is not the type of structure in making a point that I’ve come to expect from him.Since the text in question is under Class features for the druid class (weapon and armor proficiency) it sure appears that it is only in relation to the druid class abilities supernatural and spell-like class abilities. The same argument can be used for the paladin since it doesn’t say paladin class abilities it could be read that the character loses all class abilities (from any class). And it is even more logical to read the paladin one in that manner since it is not under the class features section but rather under ex-paladins.</blockquote>