Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GruTheWanderer" data-source="post: 436105" data-attributes="member: 3119">And now for my actual thoughts on the issue.  This just came up in my campaign last night (a revisit to the War of the Lance seen by humans from the other side of the tracks, specifically the nation of Khur).  I told the players when we started that any alignment was fine, but they were all friends for at least the last year.  At first the alignments were fairly normal (LN, NG, and N humans, NG half-elf, and CN kender).Last night the kender decided CE was more appropriate to his views (and played it that way).  He's also quite a dominating player in discussions (if he disagrees with others, it holds up the action for twenty or thirty minutes).  The party got into several arguments about what to do with goblin captives (in the Sunless Citadel).  Interestingly, three of the characters (LN, NG, and CE) all wanted the goblins dead (for very different reasons).  I was a little surprised by the heated discussions, but it did allow the players to really decide what their characters valued. IMO, good and evil can exist in the same party (Raistlin was an excellent example).</blockquote>