Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Evil is cool
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Janx" data-source="post: 5009446" data-attributes="member: 8835"><p>I think there's 2 vectors on the drill example.</p><p></p><p>A person who is angry has an idea involving a drill. He then meditates on this and realizes that doing so would be wrong on a number of levels. He abandons the idea, having figured out what was wrong with this idea.</p><p></p><p>OR</p><p></p><p>A person who is angry has an idea involving a drill. He dwells on this, getting angrier and angrier. he buys a drill. He makes plans on following through.</p><p></p><p>As Celebrim mentioned the 8 path thingy, the first 2 steps were right understanding and right thought. You can't have any of that if you don't contemplate WHY an idea is wrong. That means you have to actually think about stuff and destroy a negative idea. This is where a negative idea does NOT make the thinker evil.</p><p></p><p>In the second example, obviously the person is reinforcing this negative idea. This is where a negative idea CAN make the thinker evil.</p><p></p><p>Because it's all in the thinker's head, there's not a lot of proof of a crime (equating crime to evil). That in turn makes it hard to convict (being judged by others). This is why the base metric is in their actions. Because whether thought is/becomes evil action or not, evil action is where the rubber meets the road. </p><p></p><p>It is the philosophical compatibility point. We may not agree where "evil" begins, but we can probably agree on some "what is evil" points.</p><p></p><p>If we're just talking basic criminal acts like stealing, killing, it's probably cut and dry. If we're there's self-defense or starvation as a factor, it might get fuzzier. That's motivation. Which is something the legal system struggles with as well. Motive isn't supposed to matter in court, but it does to humans.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Celebrim's example of the good is defensive, evil is offensive was a pretty good explanation of the trend towards playing evil. A good defense is a good offense, as some football guy used to say. Evil tends to get the good offense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Janx, post: 5009446, member: 8835"] I think there's 2 vectors on the drill example. A person who is angry has an idea involving a drill. He then meditates on this and realizes that doing so would be wrong on a number of levels. He abandons the idea, having figured out what was wrong with this idea. OR A person who is angry has an idea involving a drill. He dwells on this, getting angrier and angrier. he buys a drill. He makes plans on following through. As Celebrim mentioned the 8 path thingy, the first 2 steps were right understanding and right thought. You can't have any of that if you don't contemplate WHY an idea is wrong. That means you have to actually think about stuff and destroy a negative idea. This is where a negative idea does NOT make the thinker evil. In the second example, obviously the person is reinforcing this negative idea. This is where a negative idea CAN make the thinker evil. Because it's all in the thinker's head, there's not a lot of proof of a crime (equating crime to evil). That in turn makes it hard to convict (being judged by others). This is why the base metric is in their actions. Because whether thought is/becomes evil action or not, evil action is where the rubber meets the road. It is the philosophical compatibility point. We may not agree where "evil" begins, but we can probably agree on some "what is evil" points. If we're just talking basic criminal acts like stealing, killing, it's probably cut and dry. If we're there's self-defense or starvation as a factor, it might get fuzzier. That's motivation. Which is something the legal system struggles with as well. Motive isn't supposed to matter in court, but it does to humans. Celebrim's example of the good is defensive, evil is offensive was a pretty good explanation of the trend towards playing evil. A good defense is a good offense, as some football guy used to say. Evil tends to get the good offense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Evil is cool
Top