Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Evil Monster Ancestries - Yay or Nay?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 9287273" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>A position philosophically associated with neutrality or perhaps chaotic neutrality. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So in other words you are Chaotic Neutral in your philosophy?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I mean as a Chaotic Neutral I'd fully expect you to perceive the beliefs and actions of a Lawful Good character as being abhorrent, including his belief that Good and Evil were objective things and not subjective value statements.</p><p></p><p>You aren't arguing against alignment. You are just positioning yourself on the wheel and then declaring your position is the absolute objective truth - just exactly like creatures in the D&D universe. Do you know objectively that good and evil are subjective value statements? Is that a matter of objective fact? Chaotic Neutral to the extent they believe anything is objective believe that is objectively true.</p><p></p><p>In part I'm just teasing you here and not fully serious. I don't for example ascribe to the alignment wheel as existing in real life or as fully descriptive of people's intellectual, philosophical, and moral outlooks. I do think it's silly that you are such a moral absolutist that by your own account you can't even explore any philosophical ground that doesn't agree with your take on good and evil. I don't even really need to argue what you seem to want to argue, which is whether your absolutist take is correct and coherent. The problem I mostly see is that it's so absolutely limiting. The fact that you are incoherent when you write something like "there's no such thing as "evil" monsters or species" and yet also "then there are creatures whose existence is basically an automatic problem for others" is merely a curiosity, since it seems to me like within your own framework you could define evil as "things whose existence is objectively basically an automatic problem for others" (which is precisely what most people mean when they say "evil") and be in like 99% agreement with the alignment wheel.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 9287273, member: 4937"] A position philosophically associated with neutrality or perhaps chaotic neutrality. So in other words you are Chaotic Neutral in your philosophy? I mean as a Chaotic Neutral I'd fully expect you to perceive the beliefs and actions of a Lawful Good character as being abhorrent, including his belief that Good and Evil were objective things and not subjective value statements. You aren't arguing against alignment. You are just positioning yourself on the wheel and then declaring your position is the absolute objective truth - just exactly like creatures in the D&D universe. Do you know objectively that good and evil are subjective value statements? Is that a matter of objective fact? Chaotic Neutral to the extent they believe anything is objective believe that is objectively true. In part I'm just teasing you here and not fully serious. I don't for example ascribe to the alignment wheel as existing in real life or as fully descriptive of people's intellectual, philosophical, and moral outlooks. I do think it's silly that you are such a moral absolutist that by your own account you can't even explore any philosophical ground that doesn't agree with your take on good and evil. I don't even really need to argue what you seem to want to argue, which is whether your absolutist take is correct and coherent. The problem I mostly see is that it's so absolutely limiting. The fact that you are incoherent when you write something like "there's no such thing as "evil" monsters or species" and yet also "then there are creatures whose existence is basically an automatic problem for others" is merely a curiosity, since it seems to me like within your own framework you could define evil as "things whose existence is objectively basically an automatic problem for others" (which is precisely what most people mean when they say "evil") and be in like 99% agreement with the alignment wheel. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Evil Monster Ancestries - Yay or Nay?
Top