Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tuxgeo" data-source="post: 6346462" data-attributes="member: 61026">Thanks for the correction. I see, based on that, that it has been far too many years since I last reread any of the Harry Potter books. Maybe this decade will be the time for it? I still have through 2021, so there's a good chance it might happen. . . .- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -And changing the subject entirely: Li Shenron and Ruin Explorer have been discussing breadth and restriction, particularly in reference to the Death Domain, and to Radiant and Necrotic damage; in connection with that, I would like to add that they should never have gotten rid of the &quot;Holy&quot; and &quot;Unholy&quot; damage types. (And WotC did do that: they replaced &quot;Holy&quot; with &quot;Radiant,&quot; which already had a different job to do; and they replaced &quot;Unholy&quot; with &quot;Necrotic,&quot; which already had a different job to do.)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tuxgeo, post: 6346462, member: 61026"] Thanks for the correction. I see, based on that, that it has been [I]far too many years[/I] since I last reread any of the Harry Potter books. Maybe this decade will be the time for it? I still have through 2021, so there's a good chance it might happen. . . . - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - And changing the subject entirely: Li Shenron and Ruin Explorer have been discussing breadth and restriction, particularly in reference to the Death Domain, and to Radiant and Necrotic damage; in connection with that, I would like to add that they should never have gotten rid of the "Holy" and "Unholy" damage types. (And WotC did do that: they replaced "Holy" with "Radiant," which already had a different job to do; and they replaced "Unholy" with "Necrotic," which already had a different job to do.) [/QUOTE]

Verification