Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="moritheil" data-source="post: 3071750" data-attributes="member: 30610">Yes, but it wouldn't be from an official book.  That's the difference.  I haven't made up this example - I've summarized it from the BoED.  You're more than welcome to look it up and quote it if you want.No, if it shows up in a WOTC book, it is how the rules work.  Whether or not you apply those rules is a separate step from understanding what the rules are.  If you've followed my posts elsewhere, you know that I don't agree with the quality of WOTC publications at times, so it's inaccurate to make the suggestion you did above.I did not come here to debate.  However, if you want to consider this in terms of debate, let me point out how the exchanges have gone.  I stated a position.  You came along to raise objections to that position, which I answered well enough that you then abandoned your approach, and stated completely new objections, which I then answered.  I also raised a few questions of my own, which were ignored (I must assume you did not find them relevant to the central issue.) This pattern repeated until at last you stated that you simply considered the RAW angle that I proposed "stupid" and "ridiculous" - your personal opinions, that you did not quote any RAW for, and that are unrelated to RAW.  I don't really think that this "debate," if you want to consider it that, has gone poorly for me at all.As I have stated before, I'm not really interested in discussing your personal opinions, as they are unlikely to be broadly applicable outside of a campaign that you are involved in.  RAW, however, is.</blockquote>

Verification