Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Saeviomagy" data-source="post: 1654991" data-attributes="member: 5890">I'm sorry - my quote was using your exact words, and it's from that that I got the idea that you would almost ignore the use of [good] spells and heavily punish the use of [evil] spells.Which IMHO is far more humane than causing them to suffer an untimely immolation. This spell says "no, don't go through the door, or bad things will happen". Glyph of warding shoots first and asks questions later.Contagion I agree should be evil. It's so ineffective as a combat tactic that it's only possible use is to make someone ill for a long time. Fireball can kill people intending you harm - it has obvious uses aside from attacking innocents.Now check the 'poison' spell.Now check "phantasmal killer"Like I said. Phantasmal killer.I'd agree. Personally however I can't imagine a reason for banning the use of poison which doesn't also preclude the use of magic to reduce someone's stats.Oh, and my take on vampiric touch. It damages a currently active opponent. It's purpose is to help you out while harming a dangerous foe. Admittedly, like any other weapon, it could be used for killing an innocent, but that's clearly not the only purpose of the spell.The only purpose of Death Knell is to cause further injury to someone who is no longer a threat to you, and furthermore empower you through his death.This is also the case with contagion: It's uses in defending yourself are so limited that it's only real use is to cause someone long-term suffering.</blockquote>

Verification