Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Evil Vs. Neutral - help me explain?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Morlock" data-source="post: 6615722" data-attributes="member: 6776981"><p>Or maybe it's better to think about alignment reflecting what you are in the dark. I.e., how you behave when no one's looking. Lawful people still follow the law, custom, tradition, what have you. Neutral means a mixed bag in this context, and Chaotic people drop law/custom/tradition the second nobody's looking. Neutral would seem to be for more "ordinary" folks (though conformity is very normal), while Chaotic would seem to be more for criminals (irrespective of morality), non-conformists, etc.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Personally, I like the idea of having more consequences for alignment than where a character goes when he dies, or what impact, if any, it has on how people perceive him (people in the real world are usually very good at hiding non-conformist "alignments" to the extent necessary for self interest). That is to say, while I don't like spells like "detect evil" very much, I could, e.g., cozy up to the idea of demons that obey rules whereby evil characters are fair game (and know evil by reading thoughts).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is so much better a description of evil than the usual "gets off on hurting people" thing, IMO. Which, as you go on to point out, is an <em>extreme</em> case of evil.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, I have more sympathy for neutrality as a middle ground for "ordinary" folks than you do.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I would go further and say that in the real world, almost all of the people I would call evil, or even who are most widely considered evil, think of themselves as good. The number of people who don't attempt to justify themselves, or seem unconcerned, strikes me as vanishingly small. It's just not how humans are wired. We're too social.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I was just going over in my head the problems my approach to alignment (try to make it align with what I see in the real world to the extent practical) that is presented by evil gods. I mean, if you've got evil gods that are widely worshipped <em>as such</em>, well, that doesn't seem to work with what I see of human nature. This is aside from evil gods that are <em>appeased</em>, like Tlaloc (not that the Aztecs weren't at least in the top 3 contenders for the most evil civilizations in human history, mind you).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You say that like it's a good thing. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Morlock, post: 6615722, member: 6776981"] Or maybe it's better to think about alignment reflecting what you are in the dark. I.e., how you behave when no one's looking. Lawful people still follow the law, custom, tradition, what have you. Neutral means a mixed bag in this context, and Chaotic people drop law/custom/tradition the second nobody's looking. Neutral would seem to be for more "ordinary" folks (though conformity is very normal), while Chaotic would seem to be more for criminals (irrespective of morality), non-conformists, etc. Personally, I like the idea of having more consequences for alignment than where a character goes when he dies, or what impact, if any, it has on how people perceive him (people in the real world are usually very good at hiding non-conformist "alignments" to the extent necessary for self interest). That is to say, while I don't like spells like "detect evil" very much, I could, e.g., cozy up to the idea of demons that obey rules whereby evil characters are fair game (and know evil by reading thoughts). This is so much better a description of evil than the usual "gets off on hurting people" thing, IMO. Which, as you go on to point out, is an [i]extreme[/i] case of evil. On the other hand, I have more sympathy for neutrality as a middle ground for "ordinary" folks than you do. I would go further and say that in the real world, almost all of the people I would call evil, or even who are most widely considered evil, think of themselves as good. The number of people who don't attempt to justify themselves, or seem unconcerned, strikes me as vanishingly small. It's just not how humans are wired. We're too social. I was just going over in my head the problems my approach to alignment (try to make it align with what I see in the real world to the extent practical) that is presented by evil gods. I mean, if you've got evil gods that are widely worshipped [i]as such[/i], well, that doesn't seem to work with what I see of human nature. This is aside from evil gods that are [i]appeased[/i], like Tlaloc (not that the Aztecs weren't at least in the top 3 contenders for the most evil civilizations in human history, mind you). You say that like it's a good thing. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Evil Vs. Neutral - help me explain?
Top