Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Evolution of D&D, and choices
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Haldrik" data-source="post: 8031742" data-attributes="member: 6694221"><p>So far, the only mechanical changes are removing alignment from the statblocks of humanoid creatures. Plus character customization options. If this resolves any <em>mechanical</em> issues relating to inclusiveness, this is painless. Even awesome. Character customization sooner rather than later. Fantastic.</p><p></p><p>If WotC assigns alignments to the ideology of a faction, then having more than one faction allows different gaming styles. For example the drow. Players who want classic Good versus Evil, then they focus on the Lolth faction as the BBEG. Players who want to play a drow hero focus on the Good faction.</p><p></p><p>In fact, to move alignment from the creature species to the faction makes Old School games work better. Because Old School too had the Good drow. Now, when an Evil wizard gathers an army of orcs, these orcs are Evil because this wizard founded an Evil faction. That is how the Old School narratives tended to explain the situation anyway.</p><p></p><p>If the word "race" is dropped and replaced with "species" or "folk" or so, it isnt really a mechanical change, but the jargon is worth mentioning. Note, species is a word that has been around for many centuries, and used to mean a different kind of creature, since Renaissance times. Renaissance words in D&D are fine ingame. (Certainly the word "species" is more appropriate in a D&D setting than is the weirdly American antiquated legalese term "race". The word "race" has too much unpleasant baggage to survive as a neutral technical term.)</p><p></p><p>Search-and-replace with the word "species" or so. Delete alignment from humanoid statblocks. Make more character customization available. Done. Mechanically.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Probably, most of the scrutiny involves flavor, tropes, images, and narratives.</p><p></p><p>So really, the reallife issues relate moreso to the SETTING, not the mechanics. So we dont need a new edition of D&D. We just need updates of the official settings.</p><p></p><p>When it comes to the settings, it is hard to say whether the updates will be minimalist tweaks or dramatic retcons.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Haldrik, post: 8031742, member: 6694221"] So far, the only mechanical changes are removing alignment from the statblocks of humanoid creatures. Plus character customization options. If this resolves any [I]mechanical[/I] issues relating to inclusiveness, this is painless. Even awesome. Character customization sooner rather than later. Fantastic. If WotC assigns alignments to the ideology of a faction, then having more than one faction allows different gaming styles. For example the drow. Players who want classic Good versus Evil, then they focus on the Lolth faction as the BBEG. Players who want to play a drow hero focus on the Good faction. In fact, to move alignment from the creature species to the faction makes Old School games work better. Because Old School too had the Good drow. Now, when an Evil wizard gathers an army of orcs, these orcs are Evil because this wizard founded an Evil faction. That is how the Old School narratives tended to explain the situation anyway. If the word "race" is dropped and replaced with "species" or "folk" or so, it isnt really a mechanical change, but the jargon is worth mentioning. Note, species is a word that has been around for many centuries, and used to mean a different kind of creature, since Renaissance times. Renaissance words in D&D are fine ingame. (Certainly the word "species" is more appropriate in a D&D setting than is the weirdly American antiquated legalese term "race". The word "race" has too much unpleasant baggage to survive as a neutral technical term.) Search-and-replace with the word "species" or so. Delete alignment from humanoid statblocks. Make more character customization available. Done. Mechanically. Probably, most of the scrutiny involves flavor, tropes, images, and narratives. So really, the reallife issues relate moreso to the SETTING, not the mechanics. So we dont need a new edition of D&D. We just need updates of the official settings. When it comes to the settings, it is hard to say whether the updates will be minimalist tweaks or dramatic retcons. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Evolution of D&D, and choices
Top