Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ankh-Morpork Guard" data-source="post: 2943288" data-attributes="member: 10079">Obviously can't argue an opinion. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />However, the best way to fix the problem(beyond getting a software only catagory put in...which I agree should be done for next year), is to vote for new judges. If the judges opinions don't mesh with yours...well, vote for new ones. There's always a very diverse group that run to be a judge, and even though repeat judges are fairly common...I expect it wouldn't be too difficult to find judges that see the industry like you, and many others, do.I AM glad to hear you aren't just stopping on Evolution. Even if it doesn't end up for the public, it looks like another amazing program. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool&nbsp; &nbsp; :cool:"&nbsp; data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ankh-Morpork Guard, post: 2943288, member: 10079"] Obviously can't argue an opinion. :) However, the best way to fix the problem(beyond getting a software only catagory put in...which I agree should be done for next year), is to vote for new judges. If the judges opinions don't mesh with yours...well, vote for new ones. There's always a very diverse group that run to be a judge, and even though repeat judges are fairly common...I expect it wouldn't be too difficult to find judges that see the industry like you, and many others, do. I AM glad to hear you aren't just stopping on Evolution. Even if it doesn't end up for the public, it looks like another amazing program. :cool: [/QUOTE]

Verification