Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
Example of LA being revised because when applied to a PC it powerscaled so horribly that buy off was considered inadequate on close examination.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 7829951" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>LA was always a very ill judged and broken mechanic that invariably produced a lack of balance. Fundamentally, the math pretty much always fails to work in all cases.</p><p></p><p>The most common source of a race or template having LA is unbalanced stats. For example, if a race or template grants a bonus to ability scores like STR, DEX, or CON, then it's clearly superior to other races.</p><p></p><p>LA tries to fix this by applying a constant penalty or modifier to the character's level. But this fails in all cases.</p><p></p><p>For low level characters, the loss of one or more levels always costs more than the benefits gained by having higher attributes. As a simple example, a 2nd level character is slightly more than twice as capable than a 1st level character, but the unbalanced attributes of a +1LA character never make a 1st level character as capable as a 2nd level character. This is increasingly true of higher numbers like +3 or +4 LA. </p><p></p><p>But at higher levels, the situation reverses. Consider the simple case of an 18th level fighter. It's fairly easy to show that there exists some amount of ability gain for which a player would willingly trade one or more levels of fighter for the increased ability. For example, +2 CON grants that 18th level fighter 1 hp/level, so trading down to 17th level while trading up for +2 increased CON pretty much invariably results in more hit points rather than less. A +2 bonus to STR grants you a +1 bonus to hit and damage as well as advantages in other areas, which is in many cases better than +1 BAB. A +2 DEX bonus grants you bonuses to initiative, missile combat, dodge bonus to AC, and many skills - which is generally flat out better than a feat. Add to these sundry benefits like natural armor bonuses, and very quickly it's obvious that the high level character (with the exception of pure casters trading for a template that didn't provide spell abilities) is getting a big benefit by switching out HD for racial bonuses. The larger these bonuses, the more impactful they are and the higher level the character the less as a percentage they are giving up by giving up a few HD. </p><p></p><p>As a result what you tended to see is that characters that were forced to begin play as low or mid-level characters generally optimized by taking low +LA races or templates, while characters that could begin play at high level were generally optimized by taking high +LA races or templates.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 7829951, member: 4937"] LA was always a very ill judged and broken mechanic that invariably produced a lack of balance. Fundamentally, the math pretty much always fails to work in all cases. The most common source of a race or template having LA is unbalanced stats. For example, if a race or template grants a bonus to ability scores like STR, DEX, or CON, then it's clearly superior to other races. LA tries to fix this by applying a constant penalty or modifier to the character's level. But this fails in all cases. For low level characters, the loss of one or more levels always costs more than the benefits gained by having higher attributes. As a simple example, a 2nd level character is slightly more than twice as capable than a 1st level character, but the unbalanced attributes of a +1LA character never make a 1st level character as capable as a 2nd level character. This is increasingly true of higher numbers like +3 or +4 LA. But at higher levels, the situation reverses. Consider the simple case of an 18th level fighter. It's fairly easy to show that there exists some amount of ability gain for which a player would willingly trade one or more levels of fighter for the increased ability. For example, +2 CON grants that 18th level fighter 1 hp/level, so trading down to 17th level while trading up for +2 increased CON pretty much invariably results in more hit points rather than less. A +2 bonus to STR grants you a +1 bonus to hit and damage as well as advantages in other areas, which is in many cases better than +1 BAB. A +2 DEX bonus grants you bonuses to initiative, missile combat, dodge bonus to AC, and many skills - which is generally flat out better than a feat. Add to these sundry benefits like natural armor bonuses, and very quickly it's obvious that the high level character (with the exception of pure casters trading for a template that didn't provide spell abilities) is getting a big benefit by switching out HD for racial bonuses. The larger these bonuses, the more impactful they are and the higher level the character the less as a percentage they are giving up by giving up a few HD. As a result what you tended to see is that characters that were forced to begin play as low or mid-level characters generally optimized by taking low +LA races or templates, while characters that could begin play at high level were generally optimized by taking high +LA races or templates. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
Example of LA being revised because when applied to a PC it powerscaled so horribly that buy off was considered inadequate on close examination.
Top