Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Davin" data-source="post: 1360141" data-attributes="member: 1183">Excellent!&nbsp; I wonder if they'll take us seriously or just blow us off and tell us to read the book?Strange ... my ELH already has 27,200 in that spot.&nbsp; Do you think it was fixed in a reprint?Yes I had, but we shouldn't actually need a formula for that (but don't tell WotC &lt;shhhhh&gt; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> ).&nbsp; It's easy enough to figure those out by doubling the numbers lower in the DMG table (if we weren't trying to get a formula to work anyway).Let us know!Is there anyone else we should also be asking in the meantime (the Sage, an ex-developer, or someone else with first-hand knowledge)?BTW, I think that formula in the ELH (that you're using in your sheet) is only supposed to be used for values above the table's range, where it probably works fine.&nbsp; They've done stranger things down lower in the table's body.&nbsp; The 3/2:4/3 rules I came up with seem to be the most consistent for everything (at least in the 3.5 table), except that they're inexplicibly applied in two different patterns.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Davin, post: 1360141, member: 1183"] Excellent! I wonder if they'll take us seriously or just blow us off and tell us to read the book? Strange ... my ELH already has 27,200 in that spot. Do you think it was fixed in a reprint? Yes I had, but we shouldn't actually need a formula for that (but don't tell WotC <shhhhh> :) ). It's easy enough to figure those out by doubling the numbers lower in the DMG table (if we weren't trying to get a formula to work anyway). Let us know! Is there anyone else we should also be asking in the meantime (the Sage, an ex-developer, or someone else with first-hand knowledge)? BTW, I think that formula in the ELH (that you're using in your sheet) is only supposed to be used for values above the table's range, where it probably works fine. They've done stranger things down lower in the table's body. The 3/2:4/3 rules I came up with seem to be the most consistent for everything (at least in the 3.5 table), except that they're inexplicibly applied in two different patterns. [/QUOTE]

Verification