Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="evilref" data-source="post: 5371492" data-attributes="member: 73517">I'll just quote your posts so you can see where you fell down:&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; This, the above, would be you directly linking, through your sentence structure and language usage, 4e and 'firing the customer'. When called upon to provide any proof you claimed:&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; So, a rumour, or possibly a blog post (maybe), the interpretation of which you think is that when 3E was being designed, they considered culling the ‘sacred cows’.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; Now, let’s just look at the first point ‘4E….Firing the customer’. Then let’s look at your substantiation ‘3E’.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; 4E….3E&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; 4th Edition ‘firing the customer’ ... ‘3rd edition rumour offered as 'evidence’.&nbsp; This why I made the point about you claiming WotC were planning on firing their customers for 4E 10 years ago. Because your argument for the ‘firing the customer’ for 4E is entirely…the 3rd edition design considerations.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; I’m not denying you may have heard a rumour regarding 3rd Edition's design considerations. It’s actually common when redesigning an RPG to consider what to keep.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; What I’m denying is that there’s any substantive link between your argument about 4th edition and the reasoning for it which has no bearing on the matter whatsoever.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="evilref, post: 5371492, member: 73517"] I'll just quote your posts so you can see where you fell down: This, the above, would be you directly linking, through your sentence structure and language usage, [B]4e [/B]and 'firing the customer'. When called upon to provide any proof you claimed: So, a rumour, or possibly a blog post (maybe), the interpretation of which you think is that when [B]3E [/B]was being designed, they considered culling the ‘sacred cows’. Now, let’s just look at the first point ‘[B]4E[/B]….Firing the customer’. Then let’s look at your substantiation ‘[B]3E[/B]’. [B]4E[/B]….[B]3E[/B] [B]4th Edition[/B] ‘firing the customer’ ... [B]‘3rd edition[/B] rumour offered as 'evidence’. This why I made the point about you claiming WotC were planning on firing their customers for [B]4E [/B]10 years ago. Because your argument for the ‘firing the customer’ for [B]4E [/B]is entirely…th[B]e 3rd edition[/B] design considerations. I’m not denying you may have heard a rumour regarding [B]3rd Edition's[/B] design considerations. It’s actually common when redesigning an RPG to consider what to keep. What I’m denying is that there’s any substantive link between your argument about [B]4th edition[/B] and the reasoning for it which has no bearing on the matter whatsoever. [/QUOTE]

Verification