Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Excerpt: Economies [merged]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fanaelialae" data-source="post: 4222409" data-attributes="member: 53980"><p>IMO, it is the DMs duty to maintain game balance. If a player came up to you and asked to replace their fighter's daily power with: </p><p></p><p>Heroic Fighter Power X [Monthly, Reliable]</p><p>Hit: 99[W]</p><p></p><p>would you allow it? Would you allow it if he gave you logical reasons for it, such as a quest he had to go on to find the one master of this special @sswhoopin technique? If he pointed out to you that since it is only once every 33 days, it should be 33 times as powerful as a fighter daily? If he wrote a fifty page short story justifying why his character should have this power?</p><p></p><p>I wouldn't. There are some things that imbalance the game. That power would be one of them. Allowing players to regularly sell their magic items for 100% value and buy items that are X levels above what they're supposed to have is another. </p><p></p><p>Granted, if you enter into a gentlemen's agreement (as someone in this thread suggested earlier) that the money will be spent on items that don't increase the PCs' power, like a castle, I don't see a problem with it. If you enter into an agreement whereby the players are trading equivalent magic items with the trader, that'd be balanced too (it wouldn't make sense from the point of versimilitude- how the heck does this trader make money if all he ever does is trade items of level X for items of level X- but it should be balanced). </p><p></p><p>But if your players are able to sell off all of their magic gear at level 10 (or even 15) to buy even just one level 30 uber sword of god-slaying, it suggests that the DM may have made a mistake. The party will be lob-sided and actually more prone to dying because of this (since they've pawned all their defensive gear), while at the same time the god-slayer wielding fighter will blenderize everything in sight. That's not a desirable outcome for anyone, as far as I can tell.</p><p></p><p>It isn't the DM's job to punish the players, but just like a child trying to stick their finger into an electrical socket because they're curious, sometimes players can be very short-sighted. The uber level 30 god-slaying sword (at level 10) that looks like fun today, may well ruin the campaign tomorrow. That's when the DM, like a responsible parent, has to respond with a firm NO. If your players don't need this kind of regulation, fantastic! Some, however, do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fanaelialae, post: 4222409, member: 53980"] IMO, it is the DMs duty to maintain game balance. If a player came up to you and asked to replace their fighter's daily power with: Heroic Fighter Power X [Monthly, Reliable] Hit: 99[W] would you allow it? Would you allow it if he gave you logical reasons for it, such as a quest he had to go on to find the one master of this special @sswhoopin technique? If he pointed out to you that since it is only once every 33 days, it should be 33 times as powerful as a fighter daily? If he wrote a fifty page short story justifying why his character should have this power? I wouldn't. There are some things that imbalance the game. That power would be one of them. Allowing players to regularly sell their magic items for 100% value and buy items that are X levels above what they're supposed to have is another. Granted, if you enter into a gentlemen's agreement (as someone in this thread suggested earlier) that the money will be spent on items that don't increase the PCs' power, like a castle, I don't see a problem with it. If you enter into an agreement whereby the players are trading equivalent magic items with the trader, that'd be balanced too (it wouldn't make sense from the point of versimilitude- how the heck does this trader make money if all he ever does is trade items of level X for items of level X- but it should be balanced). But if your players are able to sell off all of their magic gear at level 10 (or even 15) to buy even just one level 30 uber sword of god-slaying, it suggests that the DM may have made a mistake. The party will be lob-sided and actually more prone to dying because of this (since they've pawned all their defensive gear), while at the same time the god-slayer wielding fighter will blenderize everything in sight. That's not a desirable outcome for anyone, as far as I can tell. It isn't the DM's job to punish the players, but just like a child trying to stick their finger into an electrical socket because they're curious, sometimes players can be very short-sighted. The uber level 30 god-slaying sword (at level 10) that looks like fun today, may well ruin the campaign tomorrow. That's when the DM, like a responsible parent, has to respond with a firm NO. If your players don't need this kind of regulation, fantastic! Some, however, do. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Excerpt: Economies [merged]
Top