Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Storm-Bringer" data-source="post: 4196622" data-attributes="member: 57832">I don't often agree with Mr. Snow, but I had to say:  Thank God for you.I have been ranting about this for quite a while now when the subject of multi-classing comes up.  Every time someone says how badly Class X and Class Y combine, I was almost at the point of tearing out my hair.  And I have precious little to tear out.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />With apologies to Eric's Grandmother, no freaking crap*!!  Multi-classed characters were always the backup guys.  If you wanted to be the sword guy (or gal) and Cuisinart everything in your path, you play the Fighter.  If you wanted to be the Ultimate Wielder of Awesome Arcane Power, you play the Wizard.  The Fighter/Wizard doesn't get all that cool stuff, because you are splitting your attention between two classes.  You get penalized for not specializing.And now, taking a few powers and a skill from another class is like manna from heaven.  This time around, it seems to make sense that you are taking these other powers to provide backup for the main character.  That is always what multi-classing was for.Ok, we can go back to disagreeing now.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />*replace words as necessary to get the full meaning of my frustration  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification