Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Excerpt: Multiclassing (merged)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JohnSnow" data-source="post: 4196771" data-attributes="member: 32164"><p>Oh, they used them. They just complained bitterly about how their spellcasting was "subpar" or their lower-level spells were "worthless." So yeah, people used them. They just hated them.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Emphasis mine.</p><p></p><p>As for quotes to support that some people are asking for precisely that, there's plenty on pages 6-10 of the thread. I read them all. I don't feel like going back and pulling specific examples. Anyone who's claiming you should be able to have all the powers of a cleric and all the powers of a wizard (without spending feats) <strong>is</strong> asking to be as good as their single classed counterparts of the same level.</p><p></p><p>People aren't complaining it can't be done. They're complaining that it's unfair that you should have to "waste a feat" to do it. Or, alternatively, that the cost is too high. Moving on...</p><p></p><p>Given the way 1st and 2nd Edition XP worked, a 1st Edition Fighter/Wizard 6 was in a party with a Wizard 7 and a Fighter 7 (roughly, I don't have my 2e XP tables handy). Compared to the wizard, he's missing his best spell and he's one hit die down, but he's got fighter hit points and to-hit, and he can wield fighter weapons and wear armor. Compared to the fighter, he's lagging behind 1 point on his to-hit, but has the full range of spells available to a 6th-level wizard. You're telling me <em>that's</em> balanced? Are you high?!</p><p></p><p>With more balance XP tables and exponential power growth, 3e's "balance" via prestige classes works - kinda. It's a band-aid, but it works. On the other hand, it's pretty suboptimal at low levels. For instance, the Mystic Theurge has to be at least 3rd-level in each class, so by the time he takes his prestige class, he's 7th level, and still casting 2nd-level spells. By contrast, his single-classed counterparts are casting 4th-level spells and have basically been kicking his ass for 4 levels now. Things start to improve at 8th when he gets 3rd-level spells, but that's <em>8th-level</em>, almost halfway through the (non-Epic) game.</p><p></p><p>The 3e system is also ridiculously beneficial to dipping. You get WAY too much for taking a 1 or 2-level dip into, say, fighter (and many other classes). As such, they can only give so much to classes at 1st-level, so that sometimes iconic features must be postponed until later levels (c.f. the 3.5 ranger). That's a bug of the 3e system. It's one that SWSE fixed.</p><p></p><p>All of the above are just my own observations, not (necessarily) gospel truth.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JohnSnow, post: 4196771, member: 32164"] Oh, they used them. They just complained bitterly about how their spellcasting was "subpar" or their lower-level spells were "worthless." So yeah, people used them. They just hated them. Emphasis mine. As for quotes to support that some people are asking for precisely that, there's plenty on pages 6-10 of the thread. I read them all. I don't feel like going back and pulling specific examples. Anyone who's claiming you should be able to have all the powers of a cleric and all the powers of a wizard (without spending feats) [b]is[/b] asking to be as good as their single classed counterparts of the same level. People aren't complaining it can't be done. They're complaining that it's unfair that you should have to "waste a feat" to do it. Or, alternatively, that the cost is too high. Moving on... Given the way 1st and 2nd Edition XP worked, a 1st Edition Fighter/Wizard 6 was in a party with a Wizard 7 and a Fighter 7 (roughly, I don't have my 2e XP tables handy). Compared to the wizard, he's missing his best spell and he's one hit die down, but he's got fighter hit points and to-hit, and he can wield fighter weapons and wear armor. Compared to the fighter, he's lagging behind 1 point on his to-hit, but has the full range of spells available to a 6th-level wizard. You're telling me [i]that's[/i] balanced? Are you high?! With more balance XP tables and exponential power growth, 3e's "balance" via prestige classes works - kinda. It's a band-aid, but it works. On the other hand, it's pretty suboptimal at low levels. For instance, the Mystic Theurge has to be at least 3rd-level in each class, so by the time he takes his prestige class, he's 7th level, and still casting 2nd-level spells. By contrast, his single-classed counterparts are casting 4th-level spells and have basically been kicking his ass for 4 levels now. Things start to improve at 8th when he gets 3rd-level spells, but that's [i]8th-level[/i], almost halfway through the (non-Epic) game. The 3e system is also ridiculously beneficial to dipping. You get WAY too much for taking a 1 or 2-level dip into, say, fighter (and many other classes). As such, they can only give so much to classes at 1st-level, so that sometimes iconic features must be postponed until later levels (c.f. the 3.5 ranger). That's a bug of the 3e system. It's one that SWSE fixed. All of the above are just my own observations, not (necessarily) gospel truth. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Excerpt: Multiclassing (merged)
Top