Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Excerpt: Multiclassing (merged)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="see" data-source="post: 4197443" data-attributes="member: 10531"><p>The opportunity cost of something is equal to the value of the next best choice you could make. So, if your two top choices for the one power you can select are Cleave and Tide of Iron, and you very slightly prefer Cleave, then the opportunity cost of selecting Cleave is Tide of Iron. That <em>is</em> a cost. You could have the benefits of Tide of Iron, and you are giving them up for the benefits of Cleave. Tide of Iron's benefits are what you're paying for Cleave.</p><p></p><p>To make it really explicit — in 3e, your 19th-level wizard, upon reaching 20th level, could take a single level of cleric. The opportunity cost of that was giving up a 20th level of wizard. You clearly lost more than you gained by making that choice, didn't you? That loss was opportunity cost. Yes, you're still better than a 19th-level wizard, but that isn't the basis for the comparison; the comparison is to what else you could have done with that 20th character level.</p><p></p><p>Less extremely, consider a 20th level 3e wizard in combat, who is down to two spells – <em>meteor swarm</em> and <em>fireball</em>. The cost for casting <em>meteor swarm</em> this round is giving up the damage from <em>fireball</em> this round.</p><p></p><p>You're playing chess. You could move your rook to safely capture your opponent's knight, or you could you could move your bishop to safely capture his rook. If you take the rook (the more powerful piece), your opportunity cost was his knight.</p><p></p><p>You want another class's power in 4e? Then you're paying the explicit cost of a feat and the opportunity cost of the best power in your class you could have chosen otherwise.</p><p></p><p>The question then becomes, will another class's power generally be worth the combined cost of losing a feat and the best available in-class power? <strong>If</strong> the powers of the classes are finely balanced enough that the best available out-of-class power doesn't make you more powerful than the best available in-class power, the answer will be no; selecting a cross-class power will always be a suboptimal build because you gave up both an in-class power and a feat, and in exchange got a power only as powerful as your in-class power.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="see, post: 4197443, member: 10531"] The opportunity cost of something is equal to the value of the next best choice you could make. So, if your two top choices for the one power you can select are Cleave and Tide of Iron, and you very slightly prefer Cleave, then the opportunity cost of selecting Cleave is Tide of Iron. That [I]is[/I] a cost. You could have the benefits of Tide of Iron, and you are giving them up for the benefits of Cleave. Tide of Iron's benefits are what you're paying for Cleave. To make it really explicit — in 3e, your 19th-level wizard, upon reaching 20th level, could take a single level of cleric. The opportunity cost of that was giving up a 20th level of wizard. You clearly lost more than you gained by making that choice, didn't you? That loss was opportunity cost. Yes, you're still better than a 19th-level wizard, but that isn't the basis for the comparison; the comparison is to what else you could have done with that 20th character level. Less extremely, consider a 20th level 3e wizard in combat, who is down to two spells – [i]meteor swarm[/i] and [i]fireball[/i]. The cost for casting [i]meteor swarm[/i] this round is giving up the damage from [i]fireball[/i] this round. You're playing chess. You could move your rook to safely capture your opponent's knight, or you could you could move your bishop to safely capture his rook. If you take the rook (the more powerful piece), your opportunity cost was his knight. You want another class's power in 4e? Then you're paying the explicit cost of a feat and the opportunity cost of the best power in your class you could have chosen otherwise. The question then becomes, will another class's power generally be worth the combined cost of losing a feat and the best available in-class power? [B]If[/B] the powers of the classes are finely balanced enough that the best available out-of-class power doesn't make you more powerful than the best available in-class power, the answer will be no; selecting a cross-class power will always be a suboptimal build because you gave up both an in-class power and a feat, and in exchange got a power only as powerful as your in-class power. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Excerpt: Multiclassing (merged)
Top