Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Excerpt: skill challenges
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thornir Alekeg" data-source="post: 4204527" data-attributes="member: 15651"><p>What I'm wondering is if there will be a mechanism for opposed skill challenges. For example if there was a debate between the PCs and another party both appealing to the Lord to trust them over the other side. </p><p></p><p>It could be a situation where the PCs need to gain a certain number of successes before the other side does, but I then realized the DM is playing the other side and has the advantage of knowing the parameters for the debate, so he couldn't have the NPCs use Intimidate and get a failure without knowing that it was an automatic failure.</p><p></p><p>I'm thinking opposed rolls in this case might work. For example: The PCs use Diplomacy to sway the Lord. The NPC uses History to remind the Lord about the last time they trusted outsiders. NPC gets higher result = 1 failure for PCs. NPCs use Bluff to convince the Lord that Noble X trusted them in similar circumstances 2 months ago. PC use Knowledge to recall that Noble X was away on a hunting expedition during that time. PCs get higher result = 1 success. </p><p></p><p>I guess in this case I would probably even out the number of successes to failures since it isn't as passive as they PCs just having to meet a set DC for success. </p><p></p><p>Thoughts?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thornir Alekeg, post: 4204527, member: 15651"] What I'm wondering is if there will be a mechanism for opposed skill challenges. For example if there was a debate between the PCs and another party both appealing to the Lord to trust them over the other side. It could be a situation where the PCs need to gain a certain number of successes before the other side does, but I then realized the DM is playing the other side and has the advantage of knowing the parameters for the debate, so he couldn't have the NPCs use Intimidate and get a failure without knowing that it was an automatic failure. I'm thinking opposed rolls in this case might work. For example: The PCs use Diplomacy to sway the Lord. The NPC uses History to remind the Lord about the last time they trusted outsiders. NPC gets higher result = 1 failure for PCs. NPCs use Bluff to convince the Lord that Noble X trusted them in similar circumstances 2 months ago. PC use Knowledge to recall that Noble X was away on a hunting expedition during that time. PCs get higher result = 1 success. I guess in this case I would probably even out the number of successes to failures since it isn't as passive as they PCs just having to meet a set DC for success. Thoughts? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Excerpt: skill challenges
Top