Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Excerpt: skill challenges
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cadfan" data-source="post: 4205648" data-attributes="member: 40961"><p>I'm skipping most of your post because I think the issues in it are sufficiently debated above, and that I am clearly right.</p><p></p><p>But in regards to this point, I have something to add.</p><p></p><p>I am not of the school that pretends that DMing is about reaching into the ether and pulling out some kind of objective truth about the imaginary gameworld in which my campaign takes place.</p><p></p><p>Or to put things otherwise, when I set the DC for something, I know darn well that I'm setting it for a particular party of PCs played by a particular set of people.</p><p></p><p>So when it comes time for me to decide the DC for using Intimidate on a landed gentry with his own private army, I don't do some sort of magical math in my head and set the DC based on his NPC level, his Wisdom score, his ranks in Insight, the average level of the men in his private army multiplied by a weighted inversed average of the number of rounds it takes for each soldier to respond if he calls for help in the middle of a dinner party, divided by his fear of collateral damage to his mead hall during the battle.</p><p></p><p>I just ask myself, "knowing what this guy has in terms of backup, and what the PCs have in terms of leverage, how hard should it be for the PCs to intimidate this guy?" And then I set a DC. And sometimes, if the answer is "it should be freaking impossible," I don't bother setting a DC.</p><p></p><p>What this approach lacks in terms of a false pretense of objectivity, it makes up in honesty.</p><p></p><p>So from my perspective, there's no difference between declaring that the DC of an Intimidate check is 50 when I know darn well the players can't achieve that, and just saying "Intimidate doesn't work here." Except that the first way required making up an arbitrarily big number and lying to myself about where I got it.</p><p></p><p>If someone wants to go through life doing things the first way, well, they'll function in society just like a normal person. But like Dumbo and his feather, they'll be able to fly even without it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cadfan, post: 4205648, member: 40961"] I'm skipping most of your post because I think the issues in it are sufficiently debated above, and that I am clearly right. But in regards to this point, I have something to add. I am not of the school that pretends that DMing is about reaching into the ether and pulling out some kind of objective truth about the imaginary gameworld in which my campaign takes place. Or to put things otherwise, when I set the DC for something, I know darn well that I'm setting it for a particular party of PCs played by a particular set of people. So when it comes time for me to decide the DC for using Intimidate on a landed gentry with his own private army, I don't do some sort of magical math in my head and set the DC based on his NPC level, his Wisdom score, his ranks in Insight, the average level of the men in his private army multiplied by a weighted inversed average of the number of rounds it takes for each soldier to respond if he calls for help in the middle of a dinner party, divided by his fear of collateral damage to his mead hall during the battle. I just ask myself, "knowing what this guy has in terms of backup, and what the PCs have in terms of leverage, how hard should it be for the PCs to intimidate this guy?" And then I set a DC. And sometimes, if the answer is "it should be freaking impossible," I don't bother setting a DC. What this approach lacks in terms of a false pretense of objectivity, it makes up in honesty. So from my perspective, there's no difference between declaring that the DC of an Intimidate check is 50 when I know darn well the players can't achieve that, and just saying "Intimidate doesn't work here." Except that the first way required making up an arbitrarily big number and lying to myself about where I got it. If someone wants to go through life doing things the first way, well, they'll function in society just like a normal person. But like Dumbo and his feather, they'll be able to fly even without it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Excerpt: skill challenges
Top