Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Excerpt: skill challenges
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForbidenMaster" data-source="post: 4205908" data-attributes="member: 63213"><p>I dont understand why this is still an issue. The template is for a scenario in which the PCs are trying to gain the trust of the duke. Everyone here agrees that intimidating the duke would be against that goal, right? So whats the problem with the template?</p><p></p><p>The only counter is that if the PCs are using intimidate then they arent really trying to gain the dukes trust. But that isnt true, they could just be making a mistake. Either way, the template still stands. Using intimidate does not gain the trust of anyone. People are trying to apply a template to a scenario that it doesnt cover. </p><p></p><p>A scenario in which the PCs are trying to simply gain assistance by whatever means (friendly or unfriendly) would call for intimidate, as well as the other social based skills. But that is a different scenario.</p><p></p><p>Its simple, the template is for a very specific scenario in which the PCs are trying to gain the dukes trust. If you change the scenario then the template no longer applies; but that doesn't invalidate the template for its given scenario. It simply means that the template doesnt apply to the scenario given and another template is required, one which is appropriate for the other scenario.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForbidenMaster, post: 4205908, member: 63213"] I dont understand why this is still an issue. The template is for a scenario in which the PCs are trying to gain the trust of the duke. Everyone here agrees that intimidating the duke would be against that goal, right? So whats the problem with the template? The only counter is that if the PCs are using intimidate then they arent really trying to gain the dukes trust. But that isnt true, they could just be making a mistake. Either way, the template still stands. Using intimidate does not gain the trust of anyone. People are trying to apply a template to a scenario that it doesnt cover. A scenario in which the PCs are trying to simply gain assistance by whatever means (friendly or unfriendly) would call for intimidate, as well as the other social based skills. But that is a different scenario. Its simple, the template is for a very specific scenario in which the PCs are trying to gain the dukes trust. If you change the scenario then the template no longer applies; but that doesn't invalidate the template for its given scenario. It simply means that the template doesnt apply to the scenario given and another template is required, one which is appropriate for the other scenario. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Excerpt: skill challenges
Top