Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Excerpt: Weapons (MERGE)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JohnSnow" data-source="post: 4208743" data-attributes="member: 32164"><p>Caveat: I should mention that I've been training in Renaissance martial arts for the past 5 years. I also have studied the subject extensively including perusing both actual period manuals on the medieval martial arts and analyses of them by modern experts. I frequently give lessons on the subject, ranging from the mechanics of medieval weaponry to actual styles, to correcting misconceptions created by Hollywood. I can, if you'd like, provide citations for everything I've written.</p><p></p><p>If you actually read my post, you'll notice that I was using an effective real-world martial arts style (Escrima) to explain why two-weapon fighting with lightsabers would be <em>much easier</em> than two-weapon fighting with swords. I was, essentially, explaining why the <em>Star Wars</em> situation is the exception to the general rule.</p><p></p><p>You're right. In medieval (and renaissance) warfare, you generally carry either a weapon and a shield or a big, heavy, two-handed weapon. And, shocker, those are the weapons choices available to D&D fighters in Fourth Edition.</p><p></p><p>However, outside of warfare, a shield is encumbering, hard to carry, and not always as useful as you might think. For example, the renaissance style of backsword and buckler is terribly effective, both on a battlefield and off it. Bucklers are smaller than shields, easier to carry, and more maneuverable. It's not as good against unexpected attacks from multiple opponents, but most D&D combats are more like duels than warfare. A shield also impedes your vision in a way that a buckler (or defensive companion weapon) does not.</p><p></p><p>Most of the manuscripts we have on medieval fighting show surprisingly little shield work. For instance, Hans Talhoffer's seminal text on german martial arts has only two sections on using a full-sized shield, and both relate to judicial combat, not battlefield warfare. By contrast, the longsword (hand-and-a-half, remember...) is the focus of about half of the text. Contrary to popular belief, sword and buckler fighting did not originate in the Renaissance, but was used all across Europe from about the twelfth century onwards.</p><p></p><p>Basically, it comes down to this. Soldiers (and civilians) were always making tradeoffs between protection, mobility, and offense. In early times, when armor was rare or less effective, shields were more common. As armor improved, shield use declined. By the mid-to-late renaissance, many soldiers opted to forgo shields in favor of better offensive weaponry (like poleaxes and longswords), because their <em>armor alone</em> offered sufficient protection.</p><p></p><p>In civilian use, a shield is bulky, being hard to carry and hard to bring to bear quickly when you're attacked. In response, people came up with the buckler - a light, maneuverable shield that offered many of the benefits without the drawbacks. However, when pressed, a dagger can be used as an off-hand (primarily defensive!) weapon. And it's even easier to carry than a buckler. Its secondary value as a surprise attack gives it a slight offensive edge over the buckler, but it's limited area means you lose out (a little) defensively.</p><p></p><p>When choosing real weapons, tradeoffs are the name of the game. However, as my swordmasters emphasize in their training, steel versus flesh is NOT a fair contest. If someone smashes you in the face with a buckler, unless you're lucky, you're (probably) only a few moments away from getting killed. It doesn't matter that you blocked your opponent's sword when he shoves a dagger through your ribs...and so on.</p><p></p><p>If Fourth Edition can instill some sense of the tradeoffs involved while still preserving the genre flexibility we're after in a fantasy setting, I'll consider it a success.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JohnSnow, post: 4208743, member: 32164"] Caveat: I should mention that I've been training in Renaissance martial arts for the past 5 years. I also have studied the subject extensively including perusing both actual period manuals on the medieval martial arts and analyses of them by modern experts. I frequently give lessons on the subject, ranging from the mechanics of medieval weaponry to actual styles, to correcting misconceptions created by Hollywood. I can, if you'd like, provide citations for everything I've written. If you actually read my post, you'll notice that I was using an effective real-world martial arts style (Escrima) to explain why two-weapon fighting with lightsabers would be [i]much easier[/i] than two-weapon fighting with swords. I was, essentially, explaining why the [i]Star Wars[/i] situation is the exception to the general rule. You're right. In medieval (and renaissance) warfare, you generally carry either a weapon and a shield or a big, heavy, two-handed weapon. And, shocker, those are the weapons choices available to D&D fighters in Fourth Edition. However, outside of warfare, a shield is encumbering, hard to carry, and not always as useful as you might think. For example, the renaissance style of backsword and buckler is terribly effective, both on a battlefield and off it. Bucklers are smaller than shields, easier to carry, and more maneuverable. It's not as good against unexpected attacks from multiple opponents, but most D&D combats are more like duels than warfare. A shield also impedes your vision in a way that a buckler (or defensive companion weapon) does not. Most of the manuscripts we have on medieval fighting show surprisingly little shield work. For instance, Hans Talhoffer's seminal text on german martial arts has only two sections on using a full-sized shield, and both relate to judicial combat, not battlefield warfare. By contrast, the longsword (hand-and-a-half, remember...) is the focus of about half of the text. Contrary to popular belief, sword and buckler fighting did not originate in the Renaissance, but was used all across Europe from about the twelfth century onwards. Basically, it comes down to this. Soldiers (and civilians) were always making tradeoffs between protection, mobility, and offense. In early times, when armor was rare or less effective, shields were more common. As armor improved, shield use declined. By the mid-to-late renaissance, many soldiers opted to forgo shields in favor of better offensive weaponry (like poleaxes and longswords), because their [i]armor alone[/i] offered sufficient protection. In civilian use, a shield is bulky, being hard to carry and hard to bring to bear quickly when you're attacked. In response, people came up with the buckler - a light, maneuverable shield that offered many of the benefits without the drawbacks. However, when pressed, a dagger can be used as an off-hand (primarily defensive!) weapon. And it's even easier to carry than a buckler. Its secondary value as a surprise attack gives it a slight offensive edge over the buckler, but it's limited area means you lose out (a little) defensively. When choosing real weapons, tradeoffs are the name of the game. However, as my swordmasters emphasize in their training, steel versus flesh is NOT a fair contest. If someone smashes you in the face with a buckler, unless you're lucky, you're (probably) only a few moments away from getting killed. It doesn't matter that you blocked your opponent's sword when he shoves a dagger through your ribs...and so on. If Fourth Edition can instill some sense of the tradeoffs involved while still preserving the genre flexibility we're after in a fantasy setting, I'll consider it a success. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Excerpt: Weapons (MERGE)
Top