Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Excerpt: You and Your Magic Items
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Majoru Oakheart" data-source="post: 4224182" data-attributes="member: 5143"><p>I consider "You are allowed to take all PrC, feats, and spells from all books except for these 5 books and this 2 page list of ones that aren't allowed. All other rules are exactly from the book with no changes." very few house rules. Living Greyhawk only complicates things due to Adventure Records being impossible to figure out and some complications on WHICH adventures you can actually play.</p><p></p><p>The D&D Campaigns model(Legacy of the Green Regent, Xen'drik Expeditions, and so on) is even simpler. Its entire house rules is: "Only the Core Books or these X base classes. Each level you can choose one feat or spell from any other book and add it to the list of ones you are allowed."</p><p></p><p></p><p>Not all games. Our last campaign started with the words "1st level characters, all books allowed, 32 point buy, average plus 1 for hitpoints after first level, max gold for first level, no changes to the rules. If you want to be a race other than that in the PHB ask me. Bring characters to the session of Tuesday and we'll start."</p><p></p><p>Due to the changes in 4e, and without breaking my NDA, that can be reduced to: "1st level characters, no changes to the rules. If you want to be a race other than that in the PHB ask me." in 4e.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Someone once printed me out a 2 page document on changes to their game. I read the first half page before I decided this was too much work to play a game. I eventually just made up a character without reading them and managed to accidentally make a character that was legal. It wasn't for a couple of levels that I found out I had shortchanged myself a bunch of hitpoints as she had houseruled max hitpoints for levels 1-3.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Why are they too permissive? I'm not sure why saying "You can customize your character with the gear you want" is too permissive. It's been the default assumption in every RPG computer and video game I've EVER played. It's been a default assumption for ALMOST every edition of D&D(2nd being the lone hold out that I'm aware of). It's not like the rules causes players to become too powerful or the world to explode or anything like that. In fact, it creates a perfectly playable and fun game.</p><p></p><p>Even if the books said "No, Magic items are NEVER bought and sold", you'd STILL have players coming in from nearly every other game they've played with the assumption that they are.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Majoru Oakheart, post: 4224182, member: 5143"] I consider "You are allowed to take all PrC, feats, and spells from all books except for these 5 books and this 2 page list of ones that aren't allowed. All other rules are exactly from the book with no changes." very few house rules. Living Greyhawk only complicates things due to Adventure Records being impossible to figure out and some complications on WHICH adventures you can actually play. The D&D Campaigns model(Legacy of the Green Regent, Xen'drik Expeditions, and so on) is even simpler. Its entire house rules is: "Only the Core Books or these X base classes. Each level you can choose one feat or spell from any other book and add it to the list of ones you are allowed." Not all games. Our last campaign started with the words "1st level characters, all books allowed, 32 point buy, average plus 1 for hitpoints after first level, max gold for first level, no changes to the rules. If you want to be a race other than that in the PHB ask me. Bring characters to the session of Tuesday and we'll start." Due to the changes in 4e, and without breaking my NDA, that can be reduced to: "1st level characters, no changes to the rules. If you want to be a race other than that in the PHB ask me." in 4e. Someone once printed me out a 2 page document on changes to their game. I read the first half page before I decided this was too much work to play a game. I eventually just made up a character without reading them and managed to accidentally make a character that was legal. It wasn't for a couple of levels that I found out I had shortchanged myself a bunch of hitpoints as she had houseruled max hitpoints for levels 1-3. Why are they too permissive? I'm not sure why saying "You can customize your character with the gear you want" is too permissive. It's been the default assumption in every RPG computer and video game I've EVER played. It's been a default assumption for ALMOST every edition of D&D(2nd being the lone hold out that I'm aware of). It's not like the rules causes players to become too powerful or the world to explode or anything like that. In fact, it creates a perfectly playable and fun game. Even if the books said "No, Magic items are NEVER bought and sold", you'd STILL have players coming in from nearly every other game they've played with the assumption that they are. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Excerpt: You and Your Magic Items
Top