Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jhaelen" data-source="post: 4225872" data-attributes="member: 46713">Amazing how a single person can drive such a thread.Aria, everything I've read from you in this thread reminds me of an article from WotC's <a href="http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/sg/20070720" target="_blank">Save My Game</a> series. It's exactly about the kind of 'problem' you seem to see.I think you really shouldn't just dismiss the advice from this thread. Maybe, you're truly convinced there's nothing to read between the lines, but there definitely is. Even _I_ picked that up, and I'm not particularly good at spotting these things. Perhaps you should reread what e.g. AZRogue and Cadfan wrote early in this thread. I think they were spot on.About the article: I like what I see. Basically, it's just a continuation of the trends we've seen in 3E. MIC already introduced much of this and hinted at the rest.Regarding the verisimilitude (sp?) issue about fighters identifying magic swords:Actually, I think it's MORE realistic that fighters should be able to find out the properties of magic weapons than wizards. What does a wizard know about swords? Nothing! I wouldn't be surprised if fighters were also the ones creating the majority of magic weapons using rituals.</blockquote>