Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Excited by 4E fluff, bored by FR changes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Obergnom" data-source="post: 3796275" data-attributes="member: 7145"><p>Well, the titel pretty much sums up my current feeling about the story changes that will come with the new game.</p><p></p><p>The changes to core fluff seem to be exciting, as if they would build a new D&D core world, strongly resembling the old one but not the same (I do not mean Greyhawk with Core World, rahter the general background stuff, like Demons and Devils or Mindflayers and Beholders etc.). </p><p>I get the impression that the Monsters in the MM will come with much more flavor.</p><p>I see myself flipping through the new MM and getting impatient to use certain monsters that are currently on my "done that"-list. </p><p>I might be wrong, of course, but that the impression I got from reading through the fluff they let us preview so far.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, the changes to the Forgotten Realms bore me. Really, thats about it. I am a huge FR fan, and I allways came back to that setting, but this time I got the impression the realms will be left behind. I have the feeling that I will not be able to fully use the exiting new fluff that 4E might provide me, if I use the FR as my 4E setting.</p><p>I get that impression because... I do not really know, it might be because the FR have allready included most of the usual D&D stuff, and I do not see a sudden change to the way Mindflayers* act in this setting... </p><p>Maybe the reason is this: It seems like Core D&D is getting some strong background and flavor stuff (which it mostly lacked in previous editions, at least for me) and I see no way how the FR Designers would ever be able to convert or redo all of that for the realms.</p><p>If I look at MM5 and the Monsters "Core" flaver text would be better than the short "in the realms" entry, why bother playing a non core world?</p><p></p><p>So, whats your impression of 4E fluff? I myself strongly consider taking up a new setting (maybe the Necromancer Games one, 60 something pages, should not be that detailed) and mostly play homebrewed based upon the core fluff.</p><p></p><p>*(Mindflayers are used as an example, I know there is nothing released yet that shows they would be the same or change)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Obergnom, post: 3796275, member: 7145"] Well, the titel pretty much sums up my current feeling about the story changes that will come with the new game. The changes to core fluff seem to be exciting, as if they would build a new D&D core world, strongly resembling the old one but not the same (I do not mean Greyhawk with Core World, rahter the general background stuff, like Demons and Devils or Mindflayers and Beholders etc.). I get the impression that the Monsters in the MM will come with much more flavor. I see myself flipping through the new MM and getting impatient to use certain monsters that are currently on my "done that"-list. I might be wrong, of course, but that the impression I got from reading through the fluff they let us preview so far. On the other hand, the changes to the Forgotten Realms bore me. Really, thats about it. I am a huge FR fan, and I allways came back to that setting, but this time I got the impression the realms will be left behind. I have the feeling that I will not be able to fully use the exiting new fluff that 4E might provide me, if I use the FR as my 4E setting. I get that impression because... I do not really know, it might be because the FR have allready included most of the usual D&D stuff, and I do not see a sudden change to the way Mindflayers* act in this setting... Maybe the reason is this: It seems like Core D&D is getting some strong background and flavor stuff (which it mostly lacked in previous editions, at least for me) and I see no way how the FR Designers would ever be able to convert or redo all of that for the realms. If I look at MM5 and the Monsters "Core" flaver text would be better than the short "in the realms" entry, why bother playing a non core world? So, whats your impression of 4E fluff? I myself strongly consider taking up a new setting (maybe the Necromancer Games one, 60 something pages, should not be that detailed) and mostly play homebrewed based upon the core fluff. *(Mindflayers are used as an example, I know there is nothing released yet that shows they would be the same or change) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Excited by 4E fluff, bored by FR changes
Top